ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2022
Effectiveness of home-rehabilitation in patients after an acute coronary syndrome and myocardial revascularization.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biopsychosocial Prognosis Scale for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - Brazilian Version: Adaptation and Content Validity.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Alternative Models of Cardiac Rehabilitation to Promote Secondary Prevention in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Scoping Review.The Journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical activity is a mainstay (class IA) of rehabilitation programme after an acute coronary syndrome, but less than 40% of patients is physically active at one year. Home-rehabilitation, initially designed to manage the increasing number of patients in rehabilitation programmes, could result in a better strategy to increase adherence and persistence to physical activity. Objectives: To test such hypothesis, At Cardiac Rehabilitation Centre (Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Udine, Italy), physical activity adherence was compared between patients treated with a standard in-office rehabilitation programme and a cohort where home rehabilitation programme was added. Methods: From February 2017 to February 2019, 372 patients after an acute coronary syndrome (72 were excluded according to study criteria) were included, 193 patients in standard rehabilitation and 179 in home rehabilitation. At the end of follow-up, patients of both groups were called on the telephone to collect physical activity items according to a standardized questionnaire. Results: At a medium follow-up of 30.1 months, there are more physically active patients in home rehabilitation than in standard, respectively 139 vs 108 patients (77,1% vs. 56%, p < 0,0001).At multivariate analysis, including age, gender, and rehabilitation model, the probability to be fully physically active at the end of the rehabilitation programme, is 3 times higher (OR 3.0 CI 1,9-6,0 p < 0,0001) for home rehabilitation programme compared to standard one. Conclusions: Home rehabilitation, when applied to selected populations, resulted in a feasible and effective strategy to promote long term physical activity in secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.