Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663532›Full record

ReviewJournal of immunotherapy and precision oncology2021

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition as a Strategy in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Catherine R Hanna, Séan M O'Cathail, Janet Graham, Richard Adams, Campbell S D Roxburgh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine R HannaCancer Research United Kingdom Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, Scotland.
Séan M O'CathailInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Janet GrahamInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Richard AdamsCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, Wales.
Campbell S D RoxburghInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15960Cancer Research UK 28803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has seen major advances over the past 3 decades, with multimodality treatment now standard of care. Combining surgical resection with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy can reduce local recurrence from around 20% to approximately 5%. Despite improvements in local control, distant recurrence and subsequent survival rates have not changed. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved patient outcomes in several solid tumor types in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and advanced disease setting; however, in colorectal cancer, most clinical trials have been performed in the metastatic setting and the benefits confined to microsatellite instability-high tumors. In this article, we review the current preclinical and clinical evidence for using immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of LARC and discuss the rationale for specifically exploring the use of this therapy in the neoadjuvant setting. We summarize and discuss relevant clinical trials that are currently in setup and recruiting to test this treatment strategy and reflect on unanswered questions that still need to be addressed within future research efforts.

Indexed as

chemotherapyclinical trialscolorectal cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunologyimmunotherapyneoplasmradiotherapyrectum

Identifiers

PMID35663532
PMCPMC9153256
OpenAlexW3140298275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.