Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663475›Full record

ArticlePPAR research2022

PPAR-

T Fedchenko, O Izmailova, V Shynkevych, O Shlykova, I Kaidashev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PPAR research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Ameliorative effect ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T FedchenkoPoltava State Medical University, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-4925
O IzmailovaPoltava State Medical University, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4770-3494
V ShynkevychPoltava State Medical University, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2436-9449
O ShlykovaPoltava State Medical University, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-2767
I KaidashevPoltava State Medical University, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-0859
Poltava State Medical University · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The master clock, which is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), harmonizes clock genes present in the liver to synchronize life rhythms and bioactivity with the surrounding environment. The reversed feeding disrupts the expression of clock genes in the liver. Recently, a novel role of PPAR- Methods: Mice were randomly assigned to daytime-feeding and nighttime-feeding groups. Mice in daytime-feeding groups received food from 7 AM to 7 PM, and mice in nighttime-feeding groups received food from 7 PM to 7 AM. PG was administered in the dose of 20 mg/kg per os as aqueous suspension 40 Results: Administration of PG at 7 AM to nighttime-feeding mice did not reveal any influence on the expression of the clock or inflammation-related genes either at midnight or at noon. In the daytime-feeding group, PG intake at 7 PM led to an increase in Conclusions: Our study indicates that reversed feeding induced the disruption of mouse liver circadian expression pattern of clock genes accompanied by increasing

Identifiers

PMID35663475
PMCPMC9162826
OpenAlexW4281684136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.