Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663334›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2022

A Comparison of Endoscopic Closure and Laparoscopic Repair for Gastric Wall Defection.

Qiao Qiao, Huiming Tu, Bojian Fei, Kebin Xu, Fan Yang, Jie Li, Qizhong Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiao QiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, China.
Huiming TuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2709-791X
Bojian FeiDepartment of Laparoscopic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, China.
Kebin XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, China.
Qizhong GaoDepartment of Laparoscopic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic closure and laparoscopic repair for gastric wall defection. Method: The clinical data of 120 patients with submucosal tumours enrolled at our hospital between January 2014 and December 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgery they underwent: an endoscopic closure group ( Results: The surgery time in the endoscopic closure group was 56.20 ± 11.25 minutes, which was significantly lower compared with that in the laparoscopic repair group (159.35 ± 23.18 minutes; Conclusion: Non-laparoscopic-assisted surgery may be quicker, safer, and more effective for gastric wall defection.

Identifiers

PMID35663334
PMCPMC9159865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.