Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663221›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2022

Evaluation of perfusion index as an objective tool to assess analgesia during laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia.

C Surekha, Venkata S Eadara, M N Satish Kumar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Trends in research inIndian journal of anaesthesia · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C SurekhaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Venkata S EadaraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
M N Satish KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Changes in the sympathetic nervous system by pain can impact smooth muscle tone and can alter perfusion. This can be monitored by perfusion index (PI). It is a non-invasive, indirect, and continuous measure of peripheral perfusion. This study investigates the changes in PI due to painful stimuli under general anaesthesia. Methods: Twenty patients between the ages of 20 and 45 years, with informed consent, who were undergoing elective laparoscopic procedure, and belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I were connected with standard monitors along with SEDLINE, pulse oximetry (Root, Masimo Corporation®, Irvine, CA, USA) to monitor PI and Pleth-Variability Index (PVi). General anaesthesia was administered. PI, PVi, heart rate (HR), and non-invasive blood pressure were recorded pre-induction, during induction, before and after intubation, at the time of pneumoperitoneum (P0), and first laparoscopic port insertion (P1). Later, intravenous injection of fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg was administered and values were recorded at the second (P2) and third (P3) port insertion. The aforementioned parameters were recorded for up to 30 minutes. Statistical confirmation was done through paired Results: PI values after fentanyl increased from 5.33 ± 2.67 (P1) to 5.99 ± 2.8 (P2) ( Conclusion: PI can be a tool to monitor the nociception in anaesthetised patients when administering analgesia.

Indexed as

Analgesianociceptionperfusion indexplethysmography

Identifiers

PMID35663221
PMCPMC9159402
OpenAlexW4226134564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.