Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663201›Full record

ReviewOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2022

Application of Adsorptive Blood Purification Techniques during Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Cardiac Surgery.

Meng-Han Liu, Hong Yu, Rong-Hua Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Hemoadsorption contribution in neonatal cardiac surgery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. [Procalcitonin as sepsis predictor in cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meng-Han LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9363-6600
Hong YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0084-3318
Rong-Hua ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4069-0136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By reason of surgical demand, the majority of cardiovascular procedures still depend on the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Due to the nonphysiological state of CPB, it can cause complex and unpredictable inflammatory response, which may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the pharmacological and mechanical strategies that currently exist do not offer significant advantages in controlling inflammatory response and improving patient outcomes. The best strategy to reduce inflammation in CPB is still uncertain. In recent years, adsorptive blood purification techniques (BPTs) have emerged, among which CytoSorb is the latest representative device. Currently, the primary application area of adsorptive BPTs is in the control and treatment of systemic hyperinflammatory states, such as refractory septic shock patients. However, the evidences on efficacy and safety of adsorptive BPTs application during CPB surgery are still inconclusive, so we summarize the relevant evidences here and suggest future potential research areas.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiopulmonary BypassHumansInflammation

Identifiers

PMID35663201
PMCPMC9159835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.