ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2022
Real-world evidence on methotrexate-free subcutaneous tocilizumab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week data from the SIMPACT study.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02402686 (Open-Label, Multi-Center, Non-Interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Open-Label, Multi-Center, Non-Interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab SC Monotherapy in Daily Clinical Practice (SIMPACT)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of proposed biosimilar RGB-19 and tocilizumab intravenously administered to adults with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase 3, randomised study.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Comparison of the PK, PD, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of proposed biosimilar RGB-19 and tocilizumab in healthy Japanese males: a phase 1, randomised, crossover study.EULAR rheumatology open · 2025Article
- Update on tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the SIMPACT study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MTX-free s.c. tocilizumab (TCZ) therapy in RA patients. Methods: SIMPACT was an open-label, non-controlled, non-randomized, non-interventional study, in which RA patients for whom the treating physicians ordered s.c. TCZ were observed during a 24-week treatment period in Hungarian centres. Although the use of MTX was avoided during the study period, other conventional synthetic DMARDs, oral CSs and NSAIDs were allowed. Study endpoints included the change in DAS28 and clinical activity index (CDAI) scores, the proportion of patients achieving remission in the whole population and in subgroups defined based on prior RA treatment history, and age, weight or biological sex Results: Three hundred and thirty-seven RA patients were enrolled in 18 study centres. TCZ therapy significantly decreased the disease activity measured by both DAS28 ( Conclusion: Real-world clinical evidence on s.c. TCZ reported here is in line with the efficacy outcomes of randomized clinical trials. Subgroup analysis revealed that TCZ was more effective in biologic-naïve patients and in those <75 years old. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02402686.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.