Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663131›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2021

Laser therapy for genital lichen sclerosus: A systematic review of the current evidence base.

F Tasker, L Kirby, D J C Grindlay, F Lewis, R C Simpson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07240519 (Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07240519 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Expression of Inflammatory Markers in a Randomized Clinical Trial With Clobetasol Versus Laser

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRan2022 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsVulvar Lichen SclerosusArmsFractional microablative CO2 Laser
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Update vulval dermatology - diagnostics and therapy.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
  6. Efficacy of Fractional COLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Lichen sclerosus: The 2023 update.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

F TaskerKing's College London St John's Institute of Dermatology London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6746-3865
L KirbyCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-1927
D J C GrindlayCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-7182
F LewisKing's College London St John's Institute of Dermatology London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-1518
R C SimpsonCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8093-7965
University of Nottingham · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic, inflammatory dermatosis. Initial treatment with superpotent topical corticosteroids is the accepted and evidence-based first-line therapy. For those who do not respond after exclusion of other potentiating factors, the best second-line therapy is unclear. Laser therapy is an emerging treatment for genital LS and despite uncertain efficacy its use is gaining popularity in the private sector. Objectives: We aimed to review the effectiveness of laser therapy for genital LS in men, women and children. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of all primary studies reporting the use of laser in genital LS. Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched from inception to February 2021. The quality of the studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized trials and Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case studies. Results: A total of 24 studies, involving 616 adults, met inclusion criteria. These were six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one non-randomized trial, nine single arm trials and eight case series. Where assessed, most studies suggest that laser therapy in patients with LS may improve symptoms, clinical signs, quality of life and sexual function. However, results were highly heterogeneous and methodological quality was very low, therefore meta-analysis was not possible. Conclusions: There is poor evidence to support the use of laser therapy for genital LS at present. Effectiveness of laser needs to be robustly investigated in well-conducted RCTs.

Identifiers

PMID35663131
PMCPMC9060003
OpenAlexW3167184234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.