ArticleSkin health and disease2021
Laser therapy for genital lichen sclerosus: A systematic review of the current evidence base.
Article in Skin health and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07240519 (Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Expression of Inflammatory Markers in a Randomized Clinical Trial With Clobetasol Versus Laser
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Laser Treatment in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Systematic Review.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Two-year follow-up of women with lichen sclerosus treated with laser therapy: A prospective observational study.Lasers in medical science · 2026Observational
- Lichen sclerosus. Part 2. Guideline of the DGG, DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 013-105, July 2025.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Trends and Developments in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus Research.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Update vulval dermatology - diagnostics and therapy.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Fractional COLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Laser Therapy for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus, a Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Nd:YAG/Er:YAG dual laser vs. topical steroid to treat vulvar lichen sclerosus: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Lichen sclerosus: The 2023 update.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- The evidence behind the use of LASER for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vulvovaginal atrophy, urinary incontinence and lichen sclerosus: A state-of-the-art review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Review
- Laser therapy for genital lichen sclerosus: A systematic review of the current evidence base.Skin health and disease · 2021Article
- Successful Microablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Therapy for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Case Report and Mini-review.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic, inflammatory dermatosis. Initial treatment with superpotent topical corticosteroids is the accepted and evidence-based first-line therapy. For those who do not respond after exclusion of other potentiating factors, the best second-line therapy is unclear. Laser therapy is an emerging treatment for genital LS and despite uncertain efficacy its use is gaining popularity in the private sector. Objectives: We aimed to review the effectiveness of laser therapy for genital LS in men, women and children. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of all primary studies reporting the use of laser in genital LS. Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched from inception to February 2021. The quality of the studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized trials and Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case studies. Results: A total of 24 studies, involving 616 adults, met inclusion criteria. These were six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one non-randomized trial, nine single arm trials and eight case series. Where assessed, most studies suggest that laser therapy in patients with LS may improve symptoms, clinical signs, quality of life and sexual function. However, results were highly heterogeneous and methodological quality was very low, therefore meta-analysis was not possible. Conclusions: There is poor evidence to support the use of laser therapy for genital LS at present. Effectiveness of laser needs to be robustly investigated in well-conducted RCTs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.