Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663115›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2022

Do nurses document all discussions of patient problems and nursing interventions in the electronic health record? A pilot study in home healthcare.

Jiyoun Song, Maryam Zolnoori, Danielle Scharp, Sasha Vergez, Margaret V McDonald, Sridevi Sridharan, Zoran Kostic, Maxim Topaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. From Conversation to Standardized Terminology: An LLM-RAG Approach for Automated Health Problem Identification in Home Healthcare.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiyoun SongColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0362-0670
Maryam ZolnooriColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.
Danielle ScharpColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.
Sasha VergezCenter for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Margaret V McDonaldCenter for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Sridevi SridharanCenter for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Zoran KosticFu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Maxim TopazColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the overlap of information between electronic health record (EHR) and patient-nurse verbal communication in home healthcare (HHC). Methods: Patient-nurse verbal communications during home visits were recorded between February 16, 2021 and September 2, 2021 with patients being served in an organization located in the Northeast United States. Twenty-two audio recordings for 15 patients were transcribed. To compare overlap of information, manual annotations of problems and interventions were made on transcriptions as well as information from EHR including structured data and clinical notes corresponding to HHC visits. Results: About 30% (1534/5118) of utterances (ie, spoken language preceding/following silence or a change of speaker) were identified as including problems or interventions. A total of 216 problems and 492 interventions were identified through verbal communication among all the patients in the study. Approximately 50.5% of the problems and 20.8% of the interventions discussed during the verbal communication were not documented in the EHR. Preliminary results showed that statistical differences between racial groups were observed in a comparison of problems and interventions. Discussion: This study was the first to investigate the extent that problems and interventions were mentioned in patient-nurse verbal communication during HHC visits and whether this information was documented in EHR. Our analysis identified gaps in information overlap and possible racial disparities. Conclusion: Our results highlight the value of analyzing communications between HHC patients and nurses. Future studies should explore ways to capture information in verbal communication using automated speech recognition.

Indexed as

clinical noteelectronic health recordshome healthcareinformation overlapnursing informaticsverbal communication

Identifiers

PMID35663115
PMCPMC9154272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.