Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663098›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2022

Organized Scientific Diaspora and Its Contributions to Science Diplomacy in Emerging Economies: The Case of Latin America and the Caribbean.

Luisa F Echeverría-King, Reina Camacho Toro, Pedro Figueroa, Laura A Galvis, Alejandra González, Verónica Rossana Suárez, Ivonne Torres Atencio, Claudia Natalie Widmaier Müller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RAICEX: A Successful Story of the Spanish Scientific Diaspora.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Luisa F Echeverría-KingCorporación Universitaria del Caribe, Sincelejo, Colombia.
Reina Camacho ToroUMR7585 Laboratoire Physique Nucléaire et Hautes Energies (LPNHE), Paris, France.
Pedro FigueroaDiploCientifica, Santiago, Chile.
Laura A GalvisAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI) Department, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Alejandra GonzálezDepartamento de Emprendimiento e Innovación, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Verónica Rossana SuárezDiploCientifica, Santiago, Chile.
Ivonne Torres AtencioPharmacology Department, University of Panama, Panama City, Panama.
Claudia Natalie Widmaier MüllerOrganization for Women in Science for the Developing World, Trieste, Italy.
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUCorporación Universitaria del Caribe · COLaboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Hautes Énergies · FROrganization for Women in Science for the Developing World · ITUniversidad de La Sabana · COUniversidad de Panamá · PA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current knowledge society has driven an unprecedented mobility of people, especially scientists, from emerging economies to developed countries. This mobility can allow the development of human talent and the access to first class infrastructure and resources, but it can also mean a loss for emerging economies due to the phenomenon of brain drain. To counteract this situation, some countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have developed models for the articulation of their scientific diaspora in projects and programs, with the aim of exchanging knowledge and capitalizing on human and technical resources to advance science, technology and innovation systems. Likewise, science diplomacy has become a tool for interlinking the work of various actors in order to advance the solution of national, transnational or global problems through scientific advice. Scientific diasporas are vital in new structures of cooperation, enabling them to innovate and solve problems jointly, advising their countries of origin and articulating policies and programs. This research seeks to analyze the interactions and initiatives identified between the organized scientific diaspora from Latin America and the Caribbean and their countries of origin in relation to science diplomacy processes, providing recommendations and proposals for public policy to improve the interaction between the diaspora and the governments of their countries of origin. Results show that diaspora organizations from Latin America and the Caribbean engage with governmental and non-state actors and are active science diplomacy stakeholders promoting the scientific developments of their country or their researchers, as well as enabling access to research resources creating alliances for scientific, institutional and academic collaborations. In the cases studied, these efforts are planned and executed by the diaspora without responding to any science diplomacy strategy of the country. Policies and programs are needed to effectively link the scientific diaspora organizations to the interests of the countries.

Indexed as

diaspora networksemerging economiesinternational cooperationLatin Americaresearch policyscience diplomacyscientific diaspora

Identifiers

PMID35663098
PMCPMC9160366
OpenAlexW4280629332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.