ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2022
Organized Scientific Diaspora and Its Contributions to Science Diplomacy in Emerging Economies: The Case of Latin America and the Caribbean.
Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Latin American and Caribbean contributions to oral pathology/medicine journals: Cross-sectional study.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Article
- Scientific diasporas in global biodiversity governance: brain circulation, linkage, and knowledge brokerage in Colombia.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Mapping and engaging the Costa Rican scientific diaspora: experiences from over a decade implementing the hipatia.cr portal.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- The scientific African diaspora in the Nordic region: policy perspectives on strengthening Africa-Nordic technology collaboration.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Diaspora-driven knowledge diplomacy: rethinking transnational education through the CIESDEMEX model in the Global South.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Review
- From brain drain to geopolitical talent competition: scientific diasporas and the future of Global South development.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Brain drain or brain circulation? a perspective from Latin American scientists.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Connecting knowledge and action: recommendations to leverage Guatemala's scientific diaspora to address water management challenges.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Guatemala scientific and professional diaspora in Spain: an initial characterization.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Integration between the knowledge diaspora and their country of origin through institutional affiliations: a case study for policy development.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- The venezuelan scientific diaspora as a transnational actor: knowledge circulation, STI cooperation, and development.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Leveraging digital pathology and AI to transform clinical diagnosis in developing countries.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- RAICEX: A Successful Story of the Spanish Scientific Diaspora.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022Review
- Recognize and Alleviate a Resource Management Conundrum Facing Science Diaspora Networks.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current knowledge society has driven an unprecedented mobility of people, especially scientists, from emerging economies to developed countries. This mobility can allow the development of human talent and the access to first class infrastructure and resources, but it can also mean a loss for emerging economies due to the phenomenon of brain drain. To counteract this situation, some countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have developed models for the articulation of their scientific diaspora in projects and programs, with the aim of exchanging knowledge and capitalizing on human and technical resources to advance science, technology and innovation systems. Likewise, science diplomacy has become a tool for interlinking the work of various actors in order to advance the solution of national, transnational or global problems through scientific advice. Scientific diasporas are vital in new structures of cooperation, enabling them to innovate and solve problems jointly, advising their countries of origin and articulating policies and programs. This research seeks to analyze the interactions and initiatives identified between the organized scientific diaspora from Latin America and the Caribbean and their countries of origin in relation to science diplomacy processes, providing recommendations and proposals for public policy to improve the interaction between the diaspora and the governments of their countries of origin. Results show that diaspora organizations from Latin America and the Caribbean engage with governmental and non-state actors and are active science diplomacy stakeholders promoting the scientific developments of their country or their researchers, as well as enabling access to research resources creating alliances for scientific, institutional and academic collaborations. In the cases studied, these efforts are planned and executed by the diaspora without responding to any science diplomacy strategy of the country. Policies and programs are needed to effectively link the scientific diaspora organizations to the interests of the countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.