Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663039›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2022

Clinical Efficacy of Epidural Injections of Local Anesthetic Alone or Combined with Steroid for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bang-Zhi Li, Wen-Hai Tang, Yang Li, Lei Zhou, Ming-Guo Liu, Sheng-Xue Bao

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bang-Zhi LiCollege of Acupuncture and Orthopedics, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7235-556X
Wen-Hai TangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou 570100, China.
Yang LiCollege of Acupuncture and Orthopedics, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China.
Lei ZhouCollege of Acupuncture and Orthopedics, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China.
Ming-Guo LiuThe Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7908-7396
Sheng-Xue BaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hubei Provincial Armed Police Corps Hospital, Wuhan 430060, China.
Hubei University of Chinese Medicine · CNHainan Medical College Hospital · CNJiangSu Armed Police General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To compare the effectiveness of cervical epidural injections of local anesthetic with vs. without a steroid. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library) were used to search and assess all clinical randomized controlled trials regarding the clinical efficacy of epidural injections from January 01, 2009, to October 31, 2020. Cochrane review criteria and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment instrument were used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included studies. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed according to best evidence synthesis principles and by single-arm meta-analysis, respectively. Results: Based on the search criteria, 4 RCTs were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in the single-arm meta-analysis. Treatment with lidocaine alone or with the steroid resulted in decreases of 4.46 and 4.29 points, respectively, in pain scores and of 15.8 and 14.46 points, respectively, in functional scores at 6 months. Similar trends were observed at the 1-year follow-up: pain scores decreased by 4.27 and 4.14 points, while functional scores decreased by 15.94 and 14.44 points in patients with neck pain who received lidocaine without or with the steroid, respectively. In the 3 studies that reported 2-year follow-up data, patients with neck pain treated with lidocaine or lidocaine + steroid showed 4.2- and 4.14-point decreases, in pain score and 15.92- and 14.89-point decreases, respectively, in functional scores. Conclusions: The studies showed level I (strong) evidence for short- and long-term improvements in pain relief and functionality with cervical epidural injections of local anesthetic alone or with a steroid in the management of neck pain.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalNeck PainHumansInjections, EpiduralLidocaineReproducibility of ResultsSteroidsTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineSteroids

Identifiers

PMID35663039
PMCPMC9162875
OpenAlexW4281572777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.