Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35662998›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2022

Aubrey DeVeny Incorvaia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aubrey DeVeny IncorvaiaSchool of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, 685 Cherry St, NW, Atlanta, GA 30332-0345, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1001-4855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Voluntarily Stopping Eating and Drinking (VSED) is a legal means of hastening death through refusal of food and fluids - a topic rarely addressed in Christian Protestantism. Among this group, U.S. Mainline Protestants comprise nearly 15% of the population and are more likely to include social moderates and liberals who emphasize quality of life (over mere life) and may therefore be open to the practice. Objectives: Leveraging the well-established and validated Theory of Planned Behavior - that posits a person's intentions to carry out an action are motivated by one's attitude, perception of subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control - this research elucidates clergy and congregants' normative beliefs and anticipated tactical support for VSED, including their reactions to Christian-based justifications for this end-of-life option. Such reasoning includes that VSED is a "fast into eternal life" and is based on the example of Jesus Christ, who, in the face of ongoing suffering, determined the end of his own life when he stated, "It is finished," and gave up his spirit - an insight originally argued by John Donne in Biathanatos (1647/1982). Methods: This case study of one southern Anabaptist congregation employs a focus group and one-on-one interviews, capturing reactions to a vignette in which a hypothetical fellow parishioner intends to VSED in the face of ongoing suffering from a terminal illness. Results: In response to the presented vignette, study participants reported their affirmation of VSED. Responses to faith-based justifications for the practice varied widely. Conclusion: Individuals aiming to VSED in the face of terminal illness may have their intention affirmed by a church community, but will likely require additional caregiving support to achieve a hastened death. A nascent framework for future comparative studies of faith communities' assessments of VSED is also proposed.

Indexed as

Christianitydeath-and-dyingvoluntarily stopping eating and drinking

Identifiers

PMID35662998
PMCPMC9160891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.