Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35662911›Full record

ArticleNature computational science2021

Quantifying causality in data science with quasi-experiments.

Tony Liu, Lyle Ungar, Konrad Kording

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature computational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Claim causality with clarity.Psychoradiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tony LiuDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lyle UngarDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Konrad KordingDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-4499

Funding

LifeSense: Transforming Behavioral Assessment of Depression Using Personal Sensing TechnologyR01MH111610 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KORDING, KONRAD P., MOHR, DAVID CURTIS · 2017 to 2020
$3.2M
Quantifying causality for neuroscienceR01EB028162 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KORDING, KONRAD P. · 2019 to 2019
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028162NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating causality from observational data is essential in many data science questions but can be a challenging task. Here we review approaches to causality that are popular in econometrics and that exploit (quasi) random variation in existing data, called quasi-experiments, and show how they can be combined with machine learning to answer causal questions within typical data science settings. We also highlight how data scientists can help advance these methods to bring causal estimation to high-dimensional data from medicine, industry and society.

Identifiers

PMID35662911
PMCPMC9165615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.