ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2022
Visualized Analysis of Global Studies on Cervical Spondylosis Surgery: A Bibliometric Study Based on Web of Science Database and VOSviewer.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The most fundamental and popular literature on functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Mapping the scholarly landscape of Saudi Arabia-related folk medicine: a bibliometric study.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- A bibliometric mapping study of the literature on the quality of life of people living with HIV.AIDS research and therapy · 2025Article
- A bibliometric and visualization analysis of the role of traditional Chinese medicine in cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- The landscape of hot topics and research frontiers in Kawasaki disease: Scientometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Identification and analysis of hoisting safety risk factors for IBS construction based on the AcciMap and cases study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of the WoSCC Literature on the Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors as Antidepressants.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
- Effective health management strategies for patients undergoing valve replacement: a bibliometric analysis of the current research status and future directions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Current Status and research hotspots in the field of full endoscopic spine surgery: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study used multiple type of bibliometric analysis for identifying and summarizing the publications regarding cervical spondylosis surgery, for clarifying the history of this field, predicting the future hotspots of this field and improving communication among researchers. Methods: Publications from Web of Science database between 1900 and 2019 were downloaded and analyzed by Excel 2016 and VOSviewer. Bibliometric maps of co-citations and maps of co-occurrence of keywords are constructed by VOSviewer software. Results: A total of 2110 publications were searched from Web of Science. The total sum of times cited is 40448 with the average citation per publication of 19.17 times. USA published most papers (652, 30.9%). The most productive organizations is University of Toronto (96 publications). Conclusion: USA dominates the research regarding cervical spondylosis surgery. University of Toronto is the most productive organization in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.