ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
A Tandem Robotic Arm Inverse Kinematic Solution Based on an Improved Particle Swarm Algorithm.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized inverse kinematics solutions for a 6-DOF robot.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An improved particle swarm optimization framework with Jacobian guidance for inverse kinematics of non-Pieper robots.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Improved Biomimetic Beaver Behavior Optimizer for Inverse Kinematics of Rehabilitation Robotic Arms.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improved Bald Eagle Search Optimization Algorithm for the Inverse Kinematics of Robotic Manipulators.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting intensive care unit-acquired weakness: A multilayer perceptron neural network approach.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Performance evaluation of PSO-PID and PSO-FLC for continuum robot's developed modeling and control.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reinforcement learning based variable damping control of wearable robotic limbs for maintaining astronaut pose during extravehicular activity.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Article
- Multi-Objective Location and Mapping Based on Deep Learning and Visual Slam.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Image Classification and Recognition of Rice Diseases: A Hybrid DBN and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Multi-Scale Feature Fusion Convolutional Neural Network for Indoor Small Target Detection.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
- Biomimetic Vision for Zoom Object Detection Based on Improved Vertical Grid Number YOLO Algorithm.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Cost Function Determination for Human Lifting MotionFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Improved Multi-Stream Convolutional Block Attention Module for sEMG-Based Gesture Recognition.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- A Transendothelial Leukocyte Transmigration Model Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics and BP Neural Network.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Path Planning Optimization of Intelligent Vehicle Based on Improved Genetic and Ant Colony Hybrid Algorithm.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Surface Defect Segmentation Algorithm of Steel Plate Based on Geometric Median Filter Pruning.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Neural-Network-Based Model-Free Calibration Method for Stereo Fisheye Camera.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Real-Time Target Detection Method Based on Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Vibration Signal Analysis Based on Spherical Error Compensation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Multi-network collaborative lift-drag ratio prediction and airfoil optimization based on residual network and generative adversarial network.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of robot inverse kinematic solutions is the basis of robot control and path planning, and is of great importance for research. Due to the limitations of the analytical and geometric methods, intelligent algorithms are more advantageous because they can obtain approximate solutions directly from the robot's positive kinematic equations, saving a large number of computational steps. Particle Swarm Algorithm (PSO), as one of the intelligent algorithms, is widely used due to its simple principle and excellent performance. In this paper, we propose an improved particle swarm algorithm for robot inverse kinematics solving. Since the setting of weights affects the global and local search ability of the algorithm, this paper proposes an adaptive weight adjustment strategy for improving the search ability. Considering the running time of the algorithm, this paper proposes a condition setting based on the limit joints, and introduces the position coefficient k in the velocity factor. Meanwhile, an exponential product form modeling method (POE) based on spinor theory is chosen. Compared with the traditional DH modeling method, the spinor approach describes the motion of a rigid body as a whole and avoids the singularities that arise when described by a local coordinate system. In order to illustrate the advantages of the algorithm in terms of accuracy, time, convergence and adaptability, three experiments were conducted with a general six-degree-of-freedom industrial robotic arm, a PUMA560 robotic arm and a seven-degree-of-freedom robotic arm as the research objects. In all three experiments, the parameters of the robot arm, the range of joint angles, and the initial attitude and position of the end-effector of the robot arm are given, and the attitude and position of the impact point of the end-effector are set to verify whether the joint angles found by the algorithm can reach the specified positions. In Experiments 2 and 3, the algorithm proposed in this paper is compared with the traditional particle swarm algorithm (PSO) and quantum particle swarm algorithm (QPSO) in terms of position and direction solving accuracy, operation time, and algorithm convergence. The results show that compared with the other two algorithms, the algorithm proposed in this paper can ensure higher position accuracy and orientation accuracy of the robotic arm end-effector. the position error of the algorithm proposed in this paper is 0 and the maximum orientation error is 1.29 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.