ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
A Comparative Study of Hip Arthroplasty and Closed Reduction Proximal Femur Nail in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The RESCUE Technique: A Mnemonic Acronym to Enhance Outcomes in Nail Fixation of Extracapsular Hip Fractures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing Elderly Hip Fracture Care: Reducing the Length of Stay Through Guidelines Implementation.Cureus · 2025Article
- The Effect of Pre-existing Advanced Osteoarthritis in Trochanteric Femoral Fractures on Post-intramedullary Nailing Quality of Life - A Retrospective Study.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients over 70 years: Boon or bane?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical effect of hip arthroplasty and closed reduction intramedullary nailing of proximal femur in the treatment of elderly hip fracture patients. Methods: There are 90 elderly hip fracture patients being recruited in the present study. Fifty patients in Group A received closed reduction intramedullary nailing of proximal femur, and 40 patients in Group B received hip arthroplasty. All patients were followed up for 12 months after surgery, clinical outcomes included surgical indicators, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Harris score, quality of life, mental status, and complications. Results: The surgery time, bleeding volume, infusion volume of patients in Group A are all significantly lower than those in Group B ( Conclusion: Elderly hip fracture patients treated with closed reduction intramedullary nailing of proximal femur has less surgical trauma and lower complication rates, but slower postoperative recovery compared with hip arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.