ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Virtual-Augmented Reality and Life-Like Neurosurgical Simulator for Training: First Evaluation of a Hands-On Experience for Residents.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Training models and simulators for endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2023Pooled it
- Curriculum Innovation: Virtual Reality for Neuroanatomy Education Among Neurology Residents.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
- Integrating AI Segmentation, Simulated Digital Twins, and Extended Reality into Medical Education: A Narrative Technical Review and Proof-of-Concept Case Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Virtual Reality in Neurosurgery: Advancing Training, Education, and Surgical Planning.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Review
- History of medical education in neurosurgical training: moving from illustrations and cadaver dissections to virtual simulation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Development and external validation of a mixed-reality aneurysm clipping simulator.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Innovative approaches to pericardiocentesis training: a comparative study of 3D-printed and virtual reality simulation models.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of training models for intraventricular neuroendoscopy.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Neurosurgical Microvascular Anastomosis: Systematic Review of the Existing Simulators and Proposal of a New Training Classification System.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Low-Cost 3D Models for Cervical Spine Tumor Removal Training for Neurosurgery Residents.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Latex vascular injection as method for enhanced neurosurgical training and skills.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Neurocircle microsurgery model: Description of simulation-based training and exoscope.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Neurosurgical Education Using Cadaver-Free Brain Models and Augmented Reality: First Experiences from a Hands-On Simulation Course for Medical Students.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- The "Canopy Approach": Case Series Using Immersive Virtual Reality for Bottom-Up Target-Based Preoperative Planning in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Neurosurgery practice · 2023Article
- The implementation of simulators in neurosurgery training. The application of the simulator program in Peru.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
- Review
- Assessing the impact of neurosurgery and neuroanatomy simulation using 3D non-cadaveric models amongst selected African medical students.Frontiers in medical technology · 2023Article
- Visualization, navigation, augmentation. The ever-changing perspective of the neurosurgeon.Brain & spine · 2022Review
- Transformation of neurosurgical training from "see one, do one, teach one" to AR/VR & simulation - A survey by the EANS Young Neurosurgeons.Brain & spine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of ChatGPT's and Gemini's Ability to Find Studies About Neurosurgical Training and Trainees' Anatomy Understanding.ANZ journal of surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the recent years, growing interest in simulation-based surgical education has led to various practical alternatives for medical training. More recently, courses based on virtual reality (VR) and three-dimensional (3D)-printed models are available. In this paper, a hybrid (virtual and physical) neurosurgical simulator has been validated, equipped with augmented reality (AR) capabilities that can be used repeatedly to increase familiarity and improve the technical skills in human brain anatomy and neurosurgical approaches. Methods: The neurosurgical simulator used in this study (UpSurgeOn Box, UpSurgeOn Srl, Assago, Milan) combines a virtual component and a physical component with an intermediate step to provide a hybrid solution. A first reported and evaluated practical experience on the anatomical 3D-printed model has been conducted with a total of 30 residents in neurosurgery. The residents had the possibility to choose a specific approach, focus on the correct patient positioning, and go over the chosen approach step-by-step, interacting with the model through AR application. Next, each practical surgical step on the 3D model was timed and qualitatively evaluated by 3 senior neurosurgeons. Quality and usability-grade surveys were filled out by participants. Results: More than 89% of the residents assessed that the application and the AR simulator were very helpful in improving the orientation skills during neurosurgical approaches. Indeed, 89.3% of participants found brain and skull anatomy highly realistic during their tasks. Moreover, workshop exercises were considered useful in increasing the competency and technical skills required in the operating room by 85.8 and 84.7% of residents, respectively. Data collected confirmed that the anatomical model and its application were intuitive, well-integrated, and easy to use. Conclusion: The hybrid AR and 3D-printed neurosurgical simulator could be a valid tool for neurosurgical training, capable of enhancing personal technical skills and competence. In addition, it could be easy to imagine how patient safety would increase and healthcare costs would be reduced, even if more studies are needed to investigate these aspects. The integration of simulators for training in neurosurgery as preparatory steps for the operating room should be recommended and further investigated given their huge potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.