ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Chemoradiation in Patients With Anal Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving our understanding of the quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent/persistent anal cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment of stage I-III squamous cell anal cancer: a comparative effectiveness systematic review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Pooled it
- Patients' perspective in anal cancer.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Quality of Life and Healthcare Experiences of Patients with Anal Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Lived experiences of cancer care for people living with HIV who are treated for anal cancer: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Sexual Toxicity After Chemoradiation for Anal Cancer Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- MRI-based radiomics nomogram to predict complete response to definitive chemoradiation in patients with anal cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Patient-Reported Outcomes During Pelvic Radiation Therapy: A Secondary Analysis on Sexual Function From NRG-RTOG 1203.JCO oncology advances · 2025Article
- Evaluating pre-consult patient education videos for patients with newly-diagnosed anal squamous cell carcinoma: Impact on patient comprehension, satisfaction and distress.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Pleasurable and problematic receptive anal intercourse and diseases of the colon, rectum and anus.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pelvic chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is the curative therapy for non-metastatic anal cancer, resulting in excellent survival rates. However, anal cancer survivors may experience diminished quality of life (QOL) due to late toxicities from pelvic CRT. Few studies use patient-reported QOL, and few include thematic analyses of the patient experience in their own words. We conducted a survey study with qualitative analysis of free-text responses to explore themes of patient perceptions of their QOL during and after pelvic CRT to inform future interventions, reform patient education, and improve outcomes. Methods and Materials: We surveyed 248 patients with anal cancer treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy from 2010 to 2018 who were alive and without recurrence. The survey included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General 7 item version, questions about satisfaction with preparation and patient education, and an optional free-text response question. Survey free response data were analyzed using the constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Representative themes were generated. Results: One-hundred and twelve patients (45%) completed surveys. Of these respondents, 84 (75%) answered the free-text question. The median (interquartile range) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General 7 item version score for survey responders (N = 112) was 21 (range, 15-24). Three themes most mentioned by respondents were persistent toxicity effecting QOL (82%), insufficient upfront information about CRT (56%), and gratitude toward care received (35%). Conclusions: Patients described late toxicities that affect QOL after pelvic CRT for anal cancer. This may be partially due to insufficient preparative information and post-treatment support. This study contributes to the literature supporting improved patient education and side effect management to augment long-term QOL for survivors of anal cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.