ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
Pre-Operative Selective vs Non-Selective α-Blockade in Pheochromocytoma-Paraganglioma Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- What is the Cost of Selectivity? Selective and Nonselective Alpha Blockade Costs Associated with Adrenalectomy for Pheochromocytoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Short-acting urapidil compared to long-acting phenoxybenzamine in the management of pheochromocytoma.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review, assess and report on the studies that have evaluated selective alpha blockade (SAB) vs. non-selective alpha blockade (NSAB) therapy in patients undergoing surgery for pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL). We performed a systematic search of electronic databases. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the two blockades. RevMan 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis. Of the eight articles that met the inclusion criteria, there was only one randomized control trial. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the groups SAB and NSAB with regard to intra-operative systolic blood pressure (SBP) >160 mm Hg (relative risk (RR) 0.95 [95% CI 0.57, 1.56]
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.