ArticleHealthcare technology letters2022
Multiscale depth of anaesthesia prediction for surgery using frontal cortex electroencephalography.
Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting depth of anaesthesia from single-channel EEG using a deep TCN-BiLSTM-attention model with EWMA.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- On an Affordable Approach towards the Diagnosis and Care for Prostate Cancer Patients Using Urine, FTIR and Prediction Machines.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Multiscale depth of anaesthesia prediction for surgery using frontal cortex electroencephalography.Healthcare technology letters · 2022Article
- A Privacy-Preserving Markov Chain-Based Framework for Robust Motor Imagery EEG Classification in Brain-Computer Interfaces.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypnotic and sedative anaesthetic agents are employed during multiple medical interventions to prevent patient awareness. Careful titration of agent dosing is required to avoid negative side effects; the accuracy thereof may be improved by Depth of Anaesthesia Monitoring. This work investigates the potential of a patient specific depth monitoring prediction using electroencephalography recorded neural oscillation from the frontal lobe of 10 patients during sedation, where a comparison of the prediction accuracy was made across five different approaches to post-processing; Noise Assisted-Empirical Mode Decomposition, the Raw Signal, Linear Series Decomposition Learner, Deep Wavelet Scattering and Deep Learning features. These methods towards anaesthesia depth prediction were investigated using the Bispectral Index as ground truth, where it was seen that the Raw Signal, enhanced feature set and a low complexity classification model (Linear Discriminant Analysis) provided the best classification accuracy, in the region of 85.65 % ±10.23 % across the 10 subjects. Subsequent work in this area would now build on these results and validate the best performing methods on a wider cohort of patients, investigate means of continuous DoA estimation using regressions, and also feature optimisation exercises in order to further streamline and reduce the computation complexity of the designed model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.