Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35662369›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2022

The role of generative adversarial networks in brain MRI: a scoping review.

Hazrat Ali, Md Rafiul Biswas, Farida Mohsen, Uzair Shah, Asma Alamgir, Osama Mousa, Zubair Shah

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. WASABI: A Metric for Evaluating Morphometric Plausibility of Synthetic Brain MRIs.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hazrat AliCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, 34110, Doha, Qatar. haali2@hbku.edu.qa.
Md Rafiul BiswasCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, 34110, Doha, Qatar.
Farida MohsenCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, 34110, Doha, Qatar.
Uzair ShahCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, 34110, Doha, Qatar.
Asma AlamgirCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, 34110, Doha, Qatar.
Osama MousaCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, 34110, Doha, Qatar.
Zubair ShahCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, 34110, Doha, Qatar. zshah@hbku.edu.qa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of artificial intelligence (AI) for brain MRI can improve if enough data are made available. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) showed a lot of potential to generate synthetic MRI data that can capture the distribution of real MRI. Besides, GANs are also popular for segmentation, noise removal, and super-resolution of brain MRI images. This scoping review aims to explore how GANs methods are being used on brain MRI data, as reported in the literature. The review describes the different applications of GANs for brain MRI, presents the most commonly used GANs architectures, and summarizes the publicly available brain MRI datasets for advancing the research and development of GANs-based approaches. This review followed the guidelines of PRISMA-ScR to perform the study search and selection. The search was conducted on five popular scientific databases. The screening and selection of studies were performed by two independent reviewers, followed by validation by a third reviewer. Finally, the data were synthesized using a narrative approach. This review included 139 studies out of 789 search results. The most common use case of GANs was the synthesis of brain MRI images for data augmentation. GANs were also used to segment brain tumors and translate healthy images to diseased images or CT to MRI and vice versa. The included studies showed that GANs could enhance the performance of AI methods used on brain MRI imaging data. However, more efforts are needed to transform the GANs-based methods in clinical applications.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceData augmentationGenerative adversarial networksMagnetic resonance imagingMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID35662369
PMCPMC9167371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.