ArticleBiological cybernetics2022
Optimal reaching trajectories based on feedforward control.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bond graph analysis of a three-link physiological motor control system: integrating simulation and muscle behavior.Biological cybernetics · 2025Article
- A Whole-Body Coordinated Motion Control Method for Highly Redundant Degrees of Freedom Mobile Humanoid Robots.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessment and indicators of kinematic behavior and perceived fatigability.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
- Anthropomorphic motion planning for multi-degree-of-freedom arms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Upper-Limb Kinematic Behavior and Performance Fatigability of Elderly Participants Performing an Isometric Task: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In human upper-arm reaching movements, the variance of the hand position increases until the middle of the movement and then decreases toward the endpoint. Such decrease in positional variance has been suggested as an evidence to support the hypothesis that our nervous system uses feedback control, rather than feedforward control, for arm reaching tasks. In this study, we computed the optimal trajectories based on feedforward control under several criteria for a one-link two-muscle arm model with considering the stochastic property of muscle activities in order to reexamine the hypothesis. The results showed that the feedforward control also represents the decrease in positional variance in the latter half of the movement when the control signal is planned under the minimum energy cost and minimum variance models. Furthermore, the optimal trajectory that minimizes energy cost represents not only the decrease in positional variance but also many other characteristics of the human reaching movements, e.g., the three-phasic activity of antagonistic muscle, bell-shaped speed curve, N-shaped equilibrium trajectory, and bimodal profile of joint stiffness. These results suggest that minimum energy cost model well expresses the characteristics of hand reaching movements, and our central nervous system would make use of not only a feedback control but also feedforward control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35662362What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.