ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2022
Prediction of lung cancer immunotherapy response via machine learning analysis of immune cell lineage and surface markers.
Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing artificial intelligence to address immune response heterogeneity in low-dose radiation therapy.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Can blood-based markers predict RECIST progression in non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- A novel sub-regional radiomics model to predict immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Synergistic Potential of Nanomedicine in Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy: Breakthroughs and Prospects.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- The artificial intelligence and machine learning in lung cancer immunotherapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough advances have been made in cancer immunotherapy, patient benefits remain elusive. For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have shown survival benefit compared to chemotherapy. Personalization of treatment would be facilitated by a priori identification of patients likely to benefit.
objectiveThis pilot study applied a suite of machine learning methods to analyze mass cytometry data of immune cell lineage and surface markers from blood samples of a small cohort (n= 13) treated with Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, or Nivolumab as monotherapy.
methodsFour different comparisons were evaluated between data collected at an initial visit (baseline), after 12-weeks of immunotherapy, and from healthy (control) samples: healthy vs patients at baseline, Responders vs Non-Responders at baseline, Healthy vs 12-week Responders, and Responders vs Non-Responders at 12-weeks. The algorithms Random Forest, Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Elastic Net were applied to find features differentiating between these groups and provide for the capability to predict outcomes.
resultsParticular combinations and proportions of immune cell lineage and surface markers were sufficient to accurately discriminate between the groups without overfitting the data. In particular, markers associated with the B-cell phenotype were identified as key features.
conclusionsThis study illustrates a comprehensive machine learning analysis of circulating immune cell characteristics of NSCLC patients with the potential to predict response to immunotherapy. Upon further evaluation in a larger cohort, the proposed methodology could help guide personalized treatment selection in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.