Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35662000›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2022

Post-Marketing Requirements for Cancer Drugs Approved by the European Medicines Agency, 2004-2014.

Avi Cherla, Elias Mossialos, Maximilian Salcher-Konrad, Aaron S Kesselheim, Huseyin Naci

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Avi CherlaDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Elias MossialosDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Maximilian Salcher-KonradDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Aaron S KesselheimDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8867-2666
Huseyin NaciDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7192-5751
London School of Economics and Political Science · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USGesundheit Österreich · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address unresolved questions about drug safety and efficacy at the time of approval, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) may require that manufacturers conduct additional studies during the postmarketing period. As a growing proportion of new cancer drugs are approved on the basis of limited evidence of clinical benefit, timely completion of postmarketing requirements is important. We used publicly available regulatory documents to evaluate key characteristics of pivotal studies supporting EMA-approved cancer drugs from 2004-2014 and assessed completion rates of postmarketing data collection requirements after a minimum of 5 years. From 2004-2014, 79% (45/57) of EMA-approved cancer drugs had to fulfill postmarketing requirements. Pivotal trials supporting the approval of cancer drugs with postmarketing requirements were less likely to have randomized designs (41/61, 67% vs. 11/11, 100%), include an active comparator (20/61, 33% vs. 10/11, 91%), or measure overall survival as the primary study end point (18/61, 30% vs. 6/11, 55%) compared with pivotal trials for drugs without postmarketing requirements. Among 200 postmarketing requirements, almost half were designed to assess drug safety. After a minimum of 5 years, 60% (121/200) of requirements were completed, 10% (19/200) were ongoing, and 30% (60/200) were delayed. About half (40/75, 53%) of postmarketing requirements for new clinical studies were completed on time. Delays in the completion of postmarketing requirements often did not impact the likelihood of drugs receiving permanent marketing authorization (87%, 39/45) after 5 years. Our findings highlight the need for EMA to better enforce its authority to require timely completion of postmarketing requirements and studies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug ApprovalProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingEuropeHumansNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID35662000
PMCPMC9540185
OpenAlexW4281750217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.