ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2022
Choice of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay influences clinical eligibility for gastric cancer immunotherapy.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- The optimal threshold of PD-L1 combined positive score to predict the benefit of PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative gastric adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Pooled it
- A meta-analysis with systematic review: Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- DKN-01 in Combination With Tislelizumab and Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: DisTinGuish.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Real-world characterization of PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Observational
- Clinical Interchangeability of 22C3 and 28 - 8 PD-L1 assays for patient selection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- PD-L1 expression and survival in unresectable/recurrent gastric cancer treated by 1st-line treatment without immune checkpoint inhibitors: JCOG1013A1.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Barriers and Priorities for Immunotherapy Implementation in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Findings from a Two-Phase Qualitative Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Advances in the management of metastatic gastric cancer: current strategies and emerging therapeutics.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Noninvasive evaluation of treatment-related protein expression status in advanced gastric cancer using dynamic nomograms with dual-energy CT: a multicenter study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Complete response to BRICS in Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (pMMR, CPS 30): a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Targeting regulatory T cell plasticity in gastric cancer: a unified bimodal model and precision immunotherapy paradigm: a hypothesis-generating review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical stratification utility of HER2, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and CLDN18.2 in conversion therapy for gastric cancer: narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer: Standards for Reporting of Multiplex Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence Assays (STORMI).Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Current Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Gastric Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer assessed with antibodies 28-8 and 22C3.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Article
- Article
- DNA methylation profiles predicting response to anti-PD-1-based treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer.BMC medicine · 2025Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now standard-of-care treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC). To guide patient selection for ICI therapy, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) biomarker expression is routinely assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, with an increasing number of approved ICIs, each paired with a different PD-L1 antibody IHC assay used in their respective landmark trials, there is an unmet clinical and logistical need for harmonization. We investigated the interchangeability between the Dako 22C3, Dako 28-8 and Ventana SP-142 assays in GC PD-L1 IHC.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we scored 362 GC samples for PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), tumor proportion score (TPS) and immune cells (IC) using a multiplex immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence technique. Samples were obtained via biopsy or resection of gastric cancer.
resultsThe percentage of PD-L1-positive samples at clinically relevant CPS ≥ 1, ≥ 5 and ≥ 10 cut-offs for the 28-8 assay were approximately two-fold higher than that of the 22C3 (CPS ≥ 1: 70.3 vs 49.4%, p < 0.001; CPS ≥ 5: 29.1 vs 13.4%, p < 0.001; CPS ≥ 10: 13.7 vs 7.0%, p = 0.004). The mean CPS score on 28-8 assay was nearly double that of the 22C3 (6.39 ± 14.5 vs 3.46 ± 8.98, p < 0.001). At the clinically important CPS ≥ 5 cut-off, there was only moderate concordance between the 22C3 and 28-8 assays.
conclusionOur findings suggest that scoring PD-L1 CPS with the 28-8 assay may result in higher PD-L1 scores and higher proportion of PD-L1 positivity compared to 22C3 and other assays. Until stronger evidence of inter-assay concordance is found, we urge caution in treating the assays as equivalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.