ArticleLasers in medical science2022
Gingivectomy with high-power laser for correction of the gummy smile resulting from altered passive eruption-a case series.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Er: YAG laser and acid etching on bond strength of clear aligner attachments to fluorotic enamel.PloS one · 2025Article
- The influence of different cheek and lip retractors and emissivity on intraoral infrared thermography.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- Diode laser on excision of giant peripheral odontogenic myxoma: a rare case report and literature review.Lasers in medical science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy between the surgical techniques of gingivectomy with high-power laser (HPL) and conventional gingivectomy for correction of a gummy smile (GS) due to altered passive eruption (APE). This was a case series of six female patients diagnosed with GS associated with APE. For the conventional gingivectomy procedure and for the one using the diode laser (808 nm, 2 W, in continuous mode), the six upper anterior teeth were divided into two groups (control (CG)-# 11, # 12, # 13, and test (TG)-# 21, # 22, # 23). Analyses of intraoperative bleeding and levels of pain and postoperative tissue repair were performed. The thermal pattern analysis was performed using infrared thermography. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. There was no intraoperative bleeding in the TGs (p = 0.002). The CG showed tissue repair significantly better than the TG on the 14th postoperative day (p = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences regarding the level of postoperative pain between the groups (p > 0.05). Regarding the thermographic analysis, there were also no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). HPL gingivectomy was more effective, regarding the absence of intraoperative bleeding, while the conventional technique promoted better tissue repair. No significant differences were observed in the other parameters, possibly due to the minimal damage caused by gingivectomy, with either HPL or the conventional procedure, as there was no removal of bone tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.