Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661933›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association2022

Prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike antibodies in some healthcare settings in Egypt.

Engy Mohamed El-Ghitany, Azza Galal Farghaly, Shehata Farag, Mona H Hashish, Fahmy Charl, Eman A Omran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Engy Mohamed El-GhitanyDepartment of Tropical Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, Egypt. ingy.elghitany@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3157-1629
Azza Galal FarghalyDepartment of Tropical Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, Egypt.
Shehata FaragDepartment of Biostatistics, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mona H HashishDepartment of Microbiology, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, Egypt.
Fahmy CharlDepartment of Occupational Health and Industrial Medicine, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, Egypt.
Eman A OmranDepartment of Microbiology, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

Science and Technology Development Fund 43834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) are at the front line in battling infection transmission, such as that in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). Additionally, they may act as potential carriers passing the virus on to others. Anti-spike (anti-S) antibodies for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are formed either as a result of infection or vaccination with both indicating immunity against future COVID-19 infection.

aimThis study aimed to identify the prevalence of COVID-19 seropositivity among HCWs.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 559 HCWs from 39 hospitals with variable degrees of COVID-19 exposure risk (depending on the occupation, department, and hospital type). Demographic data were recorded as well as history of COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Serum samples were collected and tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies.

resultsAnti-S positivity was found in 59.0% of the participating 559 HCWs, indicating a high level of seroprotection. Of the 559 HCWs, 34.1% had reported previous infection with COVID-19. Following infection, only 46 (24.0%) of those affected received vaccination. Anti-S seropositivity was found in 39.1% of participants who were unvaccinated and had no history of infection. Physicians had the highest median anti-S titers (58.0 relative units (RU)/mL), whereas pharmacists and office staff had the lowest (25.7 and 38.2 RU/mL, respectively).

conclusionsOverall, 59.0% of the 559 HCWs were anti-S positive, indicating a relatively high seroprotective status. Among those who were unvaccinated and had no history of infection, 39.1% were seropositive for anti-S, denoting a high rate of silent/asymptomatic infections. Screening of HCWs for SARS-CoV-2 anti-S is recommended, along with the vaccination of seronegative individuals.

Indexed as

Anti-spikeCOVID-19Healthcare workersSerosurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35661933
PMCPMC9166239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.