Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661804›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2022

Deep Capillary Geometric Perfusion Deficits on OCT Angiography Detect Clinically Referable Eyes with Diabetic Retinopathy.

Peter L Nesper, Janice X Ong, Amani A Fawzi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The relationship between ON-OFF function and OCT structural and angiographic parameters in early diabetic retinal disease.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter L NesperDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Janice X OngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Amani A FawziDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: afawzimd@gmail.com.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Monitoring the hemodynamic response to therapy in diabetic retinopathyR01EY031815 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI FAWZI, AMANI A · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) of OCT angiography (OCTA) parameters for detecting clinically referable eyes with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a cohort of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

designRetrospective, cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Patients with DM with various levels of DR.

methodsWe measured vessel density, vessel length density (VLD), and geometric perfusion deficits (GPDs) in the full retina, superficial capillary plexus (SCP), and deep capillary plexus (DCP) on 3 × 3-mm OCTA images. Geometric perfusion deficit was recently described as retinal tissue located further than 30 μm from blood vessels, excluding the foveal avascular zone (FAZ). We modified the GPD metric by including the FAZ as an additional variable. Clinically referable eyes were defined as moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR) or worse retinopathy, or diabetic macular edema (DME). One eye from each patient was selected for the analysis based on image quality. We used a binary logistic regression model to adjust for covariates.

main outcome measuresSensitivity, SP, and area under the curve (AUC).

resultsSeventy-one of 150 included eyes from 150 patients (52 with DM without DR, 27 with mild NPDR, 16 with moderate NPDR, 10 with severe NPDR, 30 with proliferative DR, and 15 with DME) had clinically referable DR. Geometric perfusion deficit metric that included the FAZ performed better than GPD in detecting referable DR in the SCP (P = 0.025) but not the DCP or full retina (P > 0.05 for both). Deep capillary plexus GPD had the largest AUC for detecting clinically referable eyes (AUC = 0.965, SN = 97.2%, SP = 84.8%), which was significantly larger than the AUC for vessel density of any layer (P < 0.05 for all) but not DCP VLD (P = 0.166). The cutoff value of 2.5% for DCP GPD resulted in a highly sensitive test for detecting clinically referable eyes without adjusting for covariates (AUC = 0.955, SN = 97.2%, SP = 79.7%).

conclusionsVascular parameters in OCTA, especially in the DCP, have the potential to identify eyes that warrant further evaluation. Geometric perfusion deficits may better distinguish these clinically referable eyes with DR than standard vessel density parameters.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyMacula LuteaMacular EdemaCross-Sectional StudiesFluorescein AngiographyHumansPerfusionRetinal VesselsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceDeep capillary plexusDiabetic retinopathyOCTAOptical coherence tomography angiographyRetina

Identifiers

PMID35661804
PMCPMC9715815
OpenAlexW4282023905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.