Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661751›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2022

Sequential delay and probability discounting tasks in mice reveal anchoring effects partially attributable to decision noise.

Gerardo R Rojas, Lisa S Curry-Pochy, Cathy S Chen, Abigail T Heller, Nicola M Grissom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Neuronal implementation of the temporal difference learning algorithm in the midbrain dopaminergic system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gerardo R RojasDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Lisa S Curry-PochyDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Cathy S ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Abigail T HellerDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Nicola M GrissomDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: ngrissom@umn.edu.

Funding

Using a computational and network neuroscience framework to study pharmacological manipulations of state representation processes in early psychosisP50MH119569 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH, Sophia Vinogradov · 2020 to 2026
$24.5M
Sex-biased impacts of 16p11.2 variants on reward-guided choiceR01MH123661 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GRISSOM, NICOLA · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Using Computation to Achieve Breakthroughs in NeuroscienceT32MH115886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119569NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123661NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay discounting and probability discounting decision making tasks in rodent models have high translational potential. However, it is unclear whether the discounted value of the large reward option is the main contributor to variability in animals' choices in either task, which may limit translation to humans. Male and female mice underwent sessions of delay and probability discounting in sequence to assess how choice behavior adapts over experience with each task. To control for "anchoring" (persistent choices based on the initial delay or probability), mice experienced "Worsening" schedules where the large reward was offered under initially favorable conditions that became less favorable during testing, followed by "Improving" schedules where the large reward was offered under initially unfavorable conditions that improved over a session. During delay discounting, both male and female mice showed elimination of anchoring effects over training. In probability discounting, both sexes of mice continued to show some anchoring even after months of training. One possibility is that "noisy", exploratory choices could contribute to these persistent anchoring effects, rather than constant fluctuations in value discounting. We fit choice behavior in individual animals using models that included both a value-based discounting parameter and a decision noise parameter that captured variability in choices deviating from value maximization. Changes in anchoring behavior over time were tracked by changes in both the value and decision noise parameters in delay discounting, but by the decision noise parameter in probability discounting. Exploratory decision making was also reflected in choice response times that tracked the degree of conflict caused by both uncertainty and temporal cost, but was not linked with differences in locomotor activity reflecting chamber exploration. Thus, variable discounting behavior in mice can result from changes in exploration of the decision options rather than changes in reward valuation.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDelay DiscountingAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceProbabilityReaction TimeRewardTimeDelay discountingMiceModelingProbability discountingTouchscreen

Identifiers

PMID35661751
PMCPMC9844124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.