Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661706›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2022

Stability of mental disorder prevalence estimates among school-aged children and adolescents: findings from the community-based project to learn about youth-mental health (PLAY-MH) and replication-PLAY-MH (Re-PLAY-MH), 2014-2017.

Valentine Wanga, Melissa L Danielson, Rebecca H Bitsko, Joseph R Holbrook, Corey Lipton, Angelika H Claussen, E Rebekah Siceloff, Kate Flory

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valentine WangaDivision of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: qdy0@cdc.gov.
Melissa L DanielsonDivision of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA.
Rebecca H BitskoDivision of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA.
Joseph R HolbrookDivision of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA.
Corey LiptonBooz Allen Hamilton, Atlanta, GA.
Angelika H ClaussenDivision of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA.
E Rebekah SiceloffDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, GA.
Kate FloryDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, GA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of South Carolina · USBooz Allen Hamilton (United States) · US

Funding

Coordinating Center for Research and Training to Promote the Health of People witU01DD001007 · DD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI CARLIN, ROBERTA, MCDERMOTT, SUZANNE W · 2012 to 2016
$13.1M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study evaluated the stability over time of prevalence estimates of mental disorders among school-aged children from the same community.

methodsWe compared screening status and weighted prevalence of selected mental disorders from the two-stage school-based South Carolina Project to Learn About Youth-Mental Health (Time 1) and its replication study (Time 2) conducted between 2014 and 2017. During stage 1, two teacher screeners were used to group students into high or low risk for a mental disorder. During stage 2, parents of selected students completed a structured diagnostic interview to assess whether their child met criteria for specific disorders.

resultsFor stage 1, 19.9% of students screened as high risk for a mental disorder at Time 2 compared to 17.8% at Time 1. Among students included at both timepoints, 9.1% screened as high risk at both timepoints while screening status changed for 20.7%. The overall prevalence of included mental disorders was approximately 18% at both time points There were no differences (P-values >.05) in prevalence of individual mental disorders between Time 1 (range:0.3%-6.7%) and Time 2 (range:1.2%-7.7%).

conclusionsStudy findings demonstrate that similar methodology yielded similar prevalence estimates of mental disorders and can inform community-level planning for improving mental health in children.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthAdolescentChildHumansParentsPrevalenceSchoolsAdolescentsChildrenMental disorderMental healthParentsPrevalenceSchools

Identifiers

PMID35661706
PMCPMC10936225
OpenAlexW4281784781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.