Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661564›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis and related disorders2022

Impact of telehealth on health care in a multiple sclerosis outpatient clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vivien Li, Izanne Roos, Mastura Monif, Charles Malpas, Stefanie Roberts, Mark Marriott, Katherine Buzzard, Ai-Lan Nguyen, Nabil Seery, Lisa Taylor and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vivien LiDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: vivien.li@unimelb.edu.au.
Izanne RoosDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia; CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Mastura MonifDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Charles MalpasDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia; CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Stefanie RobertsDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia; CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark MarriottDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia.
Katherine BuzzardDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurosciences, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Ai-Lan NguyenDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia; CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Nabil SeeryDepartment of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Lisa TaylorDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia.
Tomas KalincikDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia; CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Trevor KilpatrickDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Australia; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has precipitated expansion of telemedicine in outpatient management of chronic diseases including multiple sclerosis (MS). Studies conducted pre-pandemic, when telehealth was an alternative to in-person consultations, represent a different setting to current practice. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of telehealth on MS outpatient care in a tertiary metropolitan hospital in Melbourne, Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodFrom March-December 2020, patients and clinicians in the MS outpatient clinic were surveyed regarding their attitudes towards telehealth. Scores on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) from telehealth and face-to-face appointments during the study period were compared to scores from face-to-face consultations before and after this period. Medical records were reviewed to compare management decisions made during telehealth versus face-to-face consultations. Diagnoses and treatment of MS relapses were compared to 2019.

resultsTelehealth was used in 73% of outpatient appointments. Patient satisfaction was generally high. Patients and clinicians preferred face-to-face consultations but were willing to use telehealth longer term. Overall, there were no significant delays in identifying patients experiencing disability worsening via telehealth, but EDSS increase was recorded in more face-to-face than telehealth appointments particularly for those with lower baseline disability. Disease-modifying therapy commencement rates were similar, but symptomatic therapy initiation and investigation requests occurred more frequently in face-to-face visits. Comparable numbers of MS relapses were diagnosed and treated with corticosteroids in 2019 and 2020.

conclusionsPatient satisfaction with telehealth was high, but both clinicians and patients preferred in-person appointments. Telehealth implementation did not lead to high rates of undetected disability worsening or undiagnosed acute relapses, but telehealth-based EDSS assessment may underestimate lower scores. Treatment inertia may affect some management decisions during telehealth consultations. Telehealth will likely play a role in outpatient settings beyond the COVID-19 pandemic with further studies on its long-term impact on clinical outcomes required.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisTelemedicineAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansPandemicsRecurrenceCOVID-19Multiple sclerosisOutcome assessmentOutpatient careTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35661564
PMCPMC9137249
OpenAlexW4281790426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.