Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661469›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2022

Edge-centric analysis of stroke patients: An alternative approach for biomarkers of lesion recovery.

Sebastian Idesis, Joshua Faskowitz, Richard F Betzel, Maurizio Corbetta, Olaf Sporns, Gustavo Deco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Edge-centric network control on the human brain structural network.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Living on the edge: network neuroscience beyond nodes.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sebastian IdesisCenter for Brain and Cognition (CBC), Department of Information Technologies and Communications (DTIC), Pompeu Fabra University, Edifici Mercè Rodoreda, Carrer Trias i Fargas 25-27, 08005 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Electronic address: sebastian.idesis@upf.edu.
Joshua FaskowitzDepartment of Psychological and Brain Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
Richard F BetzelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
Maurizio CorbettaPadova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, via Orus 2/B, 35129 Padova, Italy; Department of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States; Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States; VIMM, Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine (VIMM), Biomedical Foundation, via Orus 2, 35129 Padova, Italy.
Olaf SpornsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
Gustavo DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition (CBC), Department of Information Technologies and Communications (DTIC), Pompeu Fabra University, Edifici Mercè Rodoreda, Carrer Trias i Fargas 25-27, 08005 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca I Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Passeig Lluis Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Indiana University Bloomington · USInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESPompeu Fabra University · ESUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most neuroimaging studies of post-stroke recovery rely on analyses derived from standard node-centric functional connectivity to map the distributed effects in stroke patients. Here, given the importance of nonlocal and diffuse damage, we use an edge-centric approach to functional connectivity in order to provide an alternative description of the effects of this disorder. These techniques allow for the rendering of metrics such as normalized entropy, which describes the diversity of edge communities at each node. Moreover, the approach enables the identification of high amplitude co-fluctuations in fMRI time series. We found that normalized entropy is associated with stroke lesion severity and continually increases across the time of patients' recovery. Furthermore, high amplitude co-fluctuations not only relate to the lesion severity but are also associated with patients' level of recovery. The current study is the first edge-centric application for a clinical population in a longitudinal dataset and demonstrates how a different perspective for functional data analysis can further characterize topographic modulations of brain dynamics.

Indexed as

StrokeBiomarkersBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingBiomarkersBrain dynamicsEdge-centricEntropyFunctional connectivityLongitudinalStroke

Identifiers

PMID35661469
PMCPMC9163596
OpenAlexW4281391146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.