ArticleJournal of digestive diseases2022
Melanosis coli: A factor not associated with histological progression of colorectal polyps.
Article in Journal of digestive diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Melanosis coli: a contrast effect or an oncogenic effect? A large-scale retrospective cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- Colonic tubular duplication combined with congenital megacolon: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Melanosis coli: A factor not associated with histological progression of colorectal polyps.Journal of digestive diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn this study we aimed to investigate the association of melanosis coli (MC) and the colorectal polyp detection rate (PDR).
methodsIn all, 1104 MC patients and 62 181 non-MC participants were enrolled. And 2208 controls were matched by participants' age and gender, and quality of bowel preparation using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. Additionally, 490 polyps in MC and 980 in controls matched by age and gender, and size and location of polyps were analyzed. The association of PDR and pathological features of polyps with MC were also analyzed.
resultsMC patients showed a higher PDR (44.3% vs 39.3%, P = 0.006) and detection rate of low-grade adenoma (45.4% vs 36.7%, P = 0.002) but fewer large polyps (≥10 mm) (18.8% vs 26.9%, P = 0.001), fewer polyps in the left colon (33.5% vs 40.0%, P = 0.018), and a lower detection rate of advanced adenoma/adenocarcinoma (17.4% vs 24.3%, P = 0.003) than the matched controls. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, MC was independently associated with an increased PDR (odds ratio 1.184, 95% confidence interval 1.045-1.343, P = 0.008). Analysis targeting polyps showed that there were significant differences in age, gender, location, and pathology (P < 0.001) between polyps with and without MC. However, after adjusting for participants' age and gender, size and location of polyps, there was no difference between the two groups in pathology (P = 0.635).
conclusionMC is independently associated with increased colorectal PDR, but not with histological progression of polyps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.