Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661346›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2022

Normative values of intra-bolus pressure and esophageal compliance based on 4D high-resolution impedance manometry.

Wenjun Kou, Dustin A Carlson, Peter J Kahrilas, Neelesh A Patankar, John E Pandolfino

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06883175 (Evolution of the Chicago Classification), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06883175 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evolution of the Chicago Classification: Bridging Physiology and Mechanics

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2024 to 2029Enrolled575ConditionsDysphagia, Achalasia, Esophageal, Ineffective Esophageal MotilityArmsFLIP, HRM, Prucalopride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenjun KouFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2582-2070
Dustin A CarlsonFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Peter J KahrilasFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8260-1250
Neelesh A PatankarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
John E PandolfinoFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Role of altered response to volumetric distension in esophageal diseaseP01DK117824 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PANDOLFINO, JOHN E · 2018 to 2022
$7.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK117824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to quantify normative values of phase-specific intra-bolus pressure (IBP) and esophageal distensibility using 4D analysis of high-resolution-impedance manometry (HRIM).

methodsHRIM studies of supine swallows from 34 normal controls were analyzed with respect to the four phases of bolus transit: (1) accommodation, (2) compartmentalization, (3) peristalsis/esophageal emptying, and (4) ampullary emptying. Phase-specific IBP, bolus volume, and distensibility index (DI) in the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) during phases 1-3 were extracted.

resultsThe median (5-95th/IQR) IBP values were as follows: phase 1: 4.0 (-2.0-10.4/1.9-5.8) mmHg, phase 2: 5.7 (0.2-14.1/3.6-8.9) mmHg, and phase 3: 11.2 (2.9-19.4/7.7-15.1) mmHg. The median bolus volume calculated by integrating impedance planimetry cross-sectional areas was 4.1 ml during the compartmentalization phase. The EGJ-DI at max EGJ diameter during phase 2 and 3 was 2.8 (1.1-9.5/1.8-3.7) mm CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: 4D-HRIM provides a standardized methodology to track the nadir impedance and provide measurements of IBP during maximal distention across phases 1-3 of bolus transit. Median IBP and delta IBP were different across the phases, supporting the need to define IBP by phase. Additionally, the EGJ-DI calculated during phase 3 was similar to the 60-ml EGJ-DI from FLIP in the same subjects suggesting that 4D-HRIM can quantify EGJ opening during primary peristalsis.

Indexed as

EsophagusPeristalsisElectric ImpedanceEsophagogastric JunctionHumansManometrybody compliancedistensibility indexintra-bolus pressureintraluminal impedance

Identifiers

PMID35661346
PMCPMC9529819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.