Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661313›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022

Machine learning and LACE index for predicting 30-day readmissions after heart failure hospitalization in elderly patients.

Hernan Polo Friz, Valentina Esposito, Giuseppe Marano, Laura Primitz, Alice Bovio, Giovanni Delgrossi, Michele Bombelli, Guido Grignaffini, Giovanni Monza, Patrizia Boracchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Artificial intelligence in heart failure.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hernan Polo FrizInternal Medicine, Medical Department, Vimercate Hospital, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) della Brianza, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano 10, 20871, Vimercate, MB, Italy. hernanemilio.polofriz@asst-brianza.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4748-4423
Valentina EspositoAlmaviva Digitaltec S.R.L, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe MaranoDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Laura PrimitzInternal Medicine, Medical Department, Vimercate Hospital, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) della Brianza, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano 10, 20871, Vimercate, MB, Italy.
Alice BovioAlmaviva S.P.a, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni DelgrossiInformation Technology Department, ASST della Brianza, Vimercate, Italy.
Michele BombelliInternal Medicine, Medical Department, Desio Hospital, ASST della Brianza, Desio, Italy.
Guido GrignaffiniDirector for Health and Social Care, ASST della Brianza, Vimercate, Italy.
Giovanni MonzaMedical Director, ASST della Brianza, Vimercate, Italy.
Patrizia BoracchiDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera di Desio e Vimercate · ITAlmavivA (Italy) · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) techniques may improve readmission prediction performance in heart failure (HF) patients. This study aimed to assess the ability of ML algorithms to predict unplanned all-cause 30-day readmissions in HF elderly patients, and to compare them with conventional LACE (Length of hospitalization, Acuity, Comorbidities, Emergency department visits) index. All patients aged ≥ 65 years discharged alive between 2010 and 2019 after a hospitalization for acute HF were included in this retrospective cohort study. We applied MICE (Multivariate Imputation via Chained Equations) method to obtain a balanced, fully valued dataset and LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) algorithm to get the most significant features. Training (80% of records) and test (20%) cohorts were randomly selected. Study population: 3079 patients, 394 (12.8%) presented at least one readmission within 30 days, and 2685 (87.2%) did not. In the test cohort AUCs (IC95%) of XGBoost, Ada Boost Classifier, Random forest, and Gradient Boosting, and LACE Index were: 0.803 (0.734-0.872), 0.782 (0.711-0.854), 0.776 (0.703-0.848), 0.786 (0.715-0.857), and 0.504 (0.414-0.594), respectively, for predicting readmissions. A SHAP analysis was performed to offer a breakdown of the ML variables associated with readmission. Positive and negative predicting values estimates of the different ML models and LACE index were also provided, for several values of readmission rate prevalence. Among elderly patients, the rate of all-cause unplanned 30-day readmissions after hospitalization due to an acute HF was high. ML models performed better than the conventional LACE index for predicting readmissions. ML models can be proposed as promising tools for the identification of subjects at high risk of hospitalization in this clinical setting, enabling care teams to target interventions for improving overall clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Heart FailurePatient ReadmissionAgedEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAgedHeart failureMachine learningPrognosisReadmission

Identifiers

PMID35661313
OpenAlexW4281984588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.