Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661253›Full record

ReviewMedical microbiology and immunology2023

Mouse models in COVID-19 research: analyzing the adaptive immune response.

Sabrina Clever, Asisa Volz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Animal models for COVID-19 and tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabrina CleverInstitute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany. Sabrina.Clever@tiho-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-5913
Asisa VolzInstitute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

BMBF RAPID 01KI1723G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 causing the COVID-19 pandemic, resulted in a major necessity for scientific countermeasures. Investigations revealing the exact mechanisms of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis provide the basis for the development of therapeutic measures and protective vaccines against COVID-19. Animal models are inevitable for infection and pre-clinical vaccination studies as well as therapeutic testing. A well-suited animal model, mimicking the pathology seen in human COVID-19 patients, is an important basis for these investigations. Several animal models were already used during SARS-CoV-2 studies with different clinical outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we give an overview of different animal models used in SARS-CoV-2 infection studies with a focus on the mouse model. Mice provide a well-established animal model for laboratory use and several different mouse models have been generated and are being used in SARS-CoV-2 studies. Furthermore, the analysis of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells during infection and in vaccination studies in mice is highlighted.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsCOVID-19 VaccinesDisease Models, AnimalHumansMicePandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Mouse modelsSARS-CoV-2Specific T cells

Identifiers

PMID35661253
PMCPMC9166226
OpenAlexW4281610415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.