ArticleScientific reports2022
Calibration of miniature air quality detector monitoring data with PCA-RVM-NAR combination model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re-calibrating measurements of low-cost air quality monitors using PCR-GPR air quality forecasting models.PloS one · 2025Article
- A method for calibrating measurement data of a micro air quality monitor based on MLR-BRT-ARIMA combined model.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Forecasting the concentration of NO2 using statistical and machine learning methods: A case study in the UAE.Heliyon · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of miniature air quality detectors makes it possible for humans to monitor air quality in real time and grid. However, the accuracy of measuring pollutants by miniature air quality detectors needs to be improved. In this paper, the PCA-RVM-NAR combined model is proposed to calibrate the measurement accuracy of the miniature air quality detector. First, correlation analysis is used to find out the main factors affecting pollutant concentrations. Second, principal component analysis is used to reduce the dimensionality of these main factors and extract their main information. Thirdly, taking the extracted principal components as independent variables and the observed values of pollutant concentrations as dependent variables, a PCA-RVM model is established by the relevance vector machine. Finally, the nonlinear autoregressive neural network is used to correct the error and finally complete the establishment of the PCA-RVM-NAR model. Root mean square error, goodness of fit, mean absolute error and relative mean absolute percent error are used to compare the calibration effect of PCA-RVM-NAR model and other commonly used models such as multiple linear regression model, support vector machine, multilayer perceptron neural network and nonlinear autoregressive models with exogenous input. The results show that, no matter which pollutant, the PCA-RVM-NAR model achieves better calibration results than other models in the four indicators. Using this model to correct the data of the miniature air quality detector can improve its accuracy by 77.8-93.9%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.