ArticleScientific reports2022
Utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA and tumor DNA profiles in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating tumor DNA in Non-Viral head and neck squamous cell Carcinoma: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.Oral oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Role of circulating tumor DNA and cell-free DNA biomarkers in diagnosis and prognosis of oral cancer - a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Dynamic profiling of immune microenvironment during anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the IPRICE study.BMC cancer · 2023Trial
- Liquid Biopsies in HNSCC: Current Landscape and Emerging Opportunities in the Era of HPV Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Immune biomarkers for head and neck cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Review
- Liquid Biopsy and Circulating Biomarkers in Head and Neck Cancer: Advancing Non-Invasive Detection and Tailored Management.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Value of Circulating Tumor HPV DNA in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Liquid Biopsy's Role in Head and Neck Tumors: Changing Paradigms in the Era of Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Role of Cell-free DNA as a Non-Invasive Biomarker in the Detection of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2025Article
- Does circulating tumor DNA apply as a reliable biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: unraveling the path to precision immunotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Mapping the Potential of Microfluidics in Early Diagnosis and Personalized Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early recurrence detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is important for improving prognosis. Recently, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been reported to be useful in early detection or treatment response determination in various carcinomas. This study aimed to identify the utility of ctDNA for predicting recurrent metastasis in patients with HNSCC. We collected pre-treatment tissues (malignant and normal tissues) and multiple plasma samples before and after treatment for 20 cases of HNSCC treated with radical therapy. ctDNA was detected in pre-treatment plasma in 10 cases; however, there were no significant associations with tumor recurrence and staging. During follow-up, ctDNA was detected in 5 of the 7 plasma samples of recurrent cases but not in the 13 recurrence-free cases. Moreover, there was a significant difference in post-treatment relapse-free survival time between the groups with and without detected ctDNA (20.6 ± 7.7 vs. 9.6 ± 9.1 months, respectively; log-rank test, p < 0.01). Moreover, for two of the five cases with ctDNA detected after treatment, ctDNA detection was a more sensitive predictor of recurrence than imaging studies. ctDNA detection during treatment follow-up was useful in patients with HNSCC for predicting the response to treatment and recurrent metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.