Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661114›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Physiological and biochemical responses of Tanacetum balsamita L. to the foliar application of Dobogen biostimulant, glucose and KNO

Mohammad Bagher Hassanpouraghdam, Lamia Vojodi Mehrabani, Mehdi Kheiri, Antonios Chrysargyris, Nikolaos Tzortzakis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad Bagher HassanpouraghdamDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, 55181-83111, Iran. hassanpouraghdam@gmail.com.
Lamia Vojodi MehrabaniDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, 5375171379, Iran.
Mehdi KheiriDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, 5375171379, Iran.
Antonios ChrysargyrisDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, 3036, Limassol, Cyprus.
Nikolaos TzortzakisDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, 3036, Limassol, Cyprus.
Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University · IRCyprus University of Technology · CYUniversity of Maragheh · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salinity is one of the predominant abiotic stress factors that influence the growth and productivity of plants. Salinity adversely impacts the growth responses via ionic toxicity, osmotic stress, impaired nutrients uptake, hormonal disparity, and the over-production of reactive oxygen species. To study the effects of salinity stress (0, 50, 100, and 150 mM) and foliar treatments (dH

Indexed as

TanacetumAntioxidantsChlorophyll AFlavonoidsGlucoseHumansMalondialdehydePhenolsProlineSalinitySalt StressStress, PhysiologicalAntioxidantsChlorophyll AFlavonoidsGlucoseMalondialdehydePhenolsProline

Identifiers

PMID35661114
PMCPMC9167303
OpenAlexW4281659281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.