Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35661111›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2022

The effects of response inhibition training following binge memory retrieval in young adults binge eaters: a randomised-controlled experimental study.

Ravi K Das, Emma A Cawley, Louise Simeonov, Giulia Piazza, Ulrike Schmidt, Reinout W H J Wiers, Sunjeev K Kamboj

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ravi K DasClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. ravi.das@ucl.ac.uk.
Emma A CawleyClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Louise SimeonovClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Giulia PiazzaClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Ulrike SchmidtInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Reinout W H J WiersFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15916, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sunjeev K KambojClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
University College London · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R004919/1MRF_ MRF-058-0003-RG-KAMBO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binge eating is increasingly prevalent among adolescents and young adults and can have a lasting harmful impact on mental and physical health. Mechanistic insights suggest that aberrant reward-learning and biased cognitive processing may be involved in the aetiology of binge eating. We therefore investigated whether recently developed approaches to catalyse brief interventions by putatively updating maladaptive memory could also boost the effects of cognitive bias modification training on binge eating behaviour. A non-treatment-seeking sample of 90 binge eating young adults were evenly randomised to undergo either selective food response inhibition training, or sham training following binge memory reactivation. A third group received training without binge memory reactivation. Laboratory measures of reactivity and biased responses to food cues were assessed pre-post intervention and bingeing behaviour and disordered eating assessed up to 9 months post-intervention. The protocol was pre-registered at https://osf.io/82c4r/ . We found limited evidence of premorbid biased processing in lab-assessed measures of cognitive biases to self-selected images of typical binge foods. Accordingly, there was little evidence of CBM reducing these biases and this was not boosted by prior 'reactivation' of binge food reward memories. No group differences were observed on long-term bingeing behaviour, caloric consumption or disordered eating symptomatology. These findings align with recent studies showing limited impact of selective inhibition training on binge eating and do not permit conclusions regarding the utility of retrieval-dependent memory 'update' mechanisms as a treatment catalyst for response inhibition training.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderBulimiaAdolescentFeeding BehaviorHumansMemoryResearch DesignYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35661111
PMCPMC9166753
OpenAlexW4281976223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.