ArticleJournal of cell science2022
An interpretable and versatile machine learning approach for oocyte phenotyping.
Article in Journal of cell science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A transient RNP compartment boosts translation and growth of mammalian oocytes.Science advances · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence outperforms humans in morphology-based oocyte selection in cattle.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Noninvasive characterization of oocyte deformability in microconstrictions.Science advances · 2025Article
- Fluo-Cast-Bright: a deep learning pipeline for the non-invasive prediction of chromatin structure and developmental potential in live oocytes.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Methods to Characterize Mouse and Human Oocytes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Segmentation of mature human oocytes provides interpretable and improved blastocyst outcome predictions by a machine learning model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Filopodia-like protrusions of adjacent somatic cells shape the developmental potential of oocytes.Life science alliance · 2023Article
- Looking with new eyes: advanced microscopy and artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Review
- An interpretable and versatile machine learning approach for oocyte phenotyping.Journal of cell science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meiotic maturation is a crucial step of oocyte formation, allowing its potential fertilization and embryo development. Elucidating this process is important for both fundamental research and assisted reproductive technology. However, few computational tools based on non-invasive measurements are available to characterize oocyte meiotic maturation. Here, we develop a computational framework to phenotype oocytes based on images acquired in transmitted light. We trained neural networks to segment the contour of oocytes and their zona pellucida using oocytes from diverse species. We defined a comprehensive set of morphological features to describe an oocyte. These steps were implemented in an open-source Fiji plugin. We present a feature-based machine learning pipeline to recognize oocyte populations and determine morphological differences between them. We first demonstrate its potential to screen oocytes from different strains and automatically identify their morphological characteristics. Its second application is to predict and characterize the maturation potential of oocytes. We identify the texture of the zona pellucida and cytoplasmic particle size as features to assess mouse oocyte maturation potential and tested whether these features were applicable to the developmental potential of human oocytes. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.