Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35660873›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2022

Freshwater Colonization, Adaptation, and Genomic Divergence in Threespine Stickleback.

Windsor E Aguirre, Kerry Reid, Jessica Rivera, David C Heins, Krishna R Veeramah, Michael A Bell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prioritising research on endocrine disruption in the marine environment: a global perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Windsor E AguirreDepartment of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
Kerry ReidSchool of Biological Sciences, Area of Ecology and Biodiversity, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR 999077, China.
Jessica RiveraInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
David C HeinsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.
Krishna R VeeramahDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Michael A BellUniversity of California Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6861-5787
Stony Brook University · USDePaul University · USMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology · USTulane University · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Dynamics of Contemporary Genomic Evolution in Replicate Threespine Stickleback PopulationsR01GM124330 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI VEERAMAH, KRISHNA R · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
National Science Foundation DEB-0509070NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Threespine Stickleback is ancestrally a marine fish, but many marine populations breed in fresh water (i.e., are anadromous), facilitating their colonization of isolated freshwater habitats a few years after they form. Repeated adaptation to fresh water during at least 10 My and continuing today has led to Threespine Stickleback becoming a premier system to study rapid adaptation. Anadromous and freshwater stickleback breed in sympatry and may hybridize, resulting in introgression of freshwater-adaptive alleles into anadromous populations, where they are maintained at low frequencies as ancient standing genetic variation. Anadromous stickleback have accumulated hundreds of freshwater-adaptive alleles that are disbursed as few loci per marine individual and provide the basis for adaptation when they colonize fresh water. Recent whole-lake experiments in lakes around Cook Inlet, Alaska have revealed how astonishingly rapid and repeatable this process is, with the frequency of 40% of the identified freshwater-adaptive alleles increasing from negligible (∼1%) in the marine founder to ≥50% within ten generations in fresh water, and freshwater phenotypes evolving accordingly. These high rates of genomic and phenotypic evolution imply very intense directional selection on phenotypes of heterozygotes. Sexual recombination rapidly assembles freshwater-adaptive alleles that originated in different founders into multilocus freshwater haplotypes, and regions important for adaptation to freshwater have suppressed recombination that keeps advantageous alleles linked within large haploblocks. These large haploblocks are also older and appear to have accumulated linked advantageous mutations. The contemporary evolution of Threespine Stickleback has provided broadly applicable insights into the mechanisms that facilitate rapid adaptation.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticSmegmamorphaAdaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesAnimalsGenomicsLakes

Identifiers

PMID35660873
PMCPMC9405723
OpenAlexW4282918599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.