Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35660461›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

A multi-site, multi-participant magnetoencephalography resting-state dataset to study dementia: The BioFIND dataset.

Delshad Vaghari, Ricardo Bruna, Laura E Hughes, David Nesbitt, Roni Tibon, James B Rowe, Fernando Maestu, Richard N Henson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Shift Toward Supercritical Brain Dynamics Predicts Alzheimer's Disease Progression.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Canonical Hidden Markov Model Networks for studying M/EEG.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Delshad VaghariMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.
Ricardo BrunaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain; Center for Biomedical Technology, Laboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience (UCM-UPM), Spain.
Laura E HughesMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
David NesbittMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Roni TibonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
James B RoweMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK.
Fernando MaestuDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain; Center for Biomedical Technology, Laboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience (UCM-UPM), Spain.
Richard N HensonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK; Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: rik.henson@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESTarbiat Modares University · IR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008217/1Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_U105579226Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/8Medical Research Council MR/P502017/1Medical Research Council MR/T033371/1Medical Research Council SUAG/010-RG91365Wellcome Trust 103838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is vital to reduce the burden of dementia and for developing effective treatments. Neuroimaging can detect early brain changes, such as hippocampal atrophy in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a prodromal state of AD. However, selecting the most informative imaging features by machine-learning requires many cases. While large publically-available datasets of people with dementia or prodromal disease exist for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), comparable datasets are missing for Magnetoencephalography (MEG). MEG offers advantages in its millisecond resolution, revealing physiological changes in brain oscillations or connectivity before structural changes are evident with MRI. We introduce a MEG dataset with 324 individuals: patients with MCI and healthy controls. Their brain activity was recorded while resting with eyes closed, using a 306-channel MEG scanner at one of two sites (Madrid or Cambridge), enabling tests of generalization across sites. A T1-weighted MRI is provided to assist source localisation. The MEG and MRI data are formatted according to international BIDS standards and analysed freely on the DPUK platform (https://portal.dementiasplatform.uk/Apply). Here, we describe this dataset in detail, report some example (benchmark) analyses, and consider its limitations and future directions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID35660461
PMCPMC7613066
OpenAlexW4281712021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.