Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35660355›Full record

ArticleClinical lung cancer2022

Extended Delay to Treatment for Stage III-IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Survival: Balancing Risks During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Nicholas R Mayne, Simar S Bajaj, Joseph Powell, Holly C Elser, Barbara S Civiello, Florian J Fintelmann, Xiao Li, Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical lung cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19 and lung cancer.Pathologica · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicholas R MayneDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Simar S BajajDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Joseph PowellCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Holly C ElserStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UC Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA.
Barbara S CivielloSeacoast Cancer Center at Wentworth Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH.
Florian J FintelmannDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Xiao LiCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Chi-Fu Jeffrey YangDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Seacoast Cancer Center at Wentworth Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH. Electronic address: cjyang@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients may encounter lung cancer care delays. Here, we sought to examine the impact of extended treatment delay for stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer on patient survival. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data, Cox regression analysis with penalized smoothing splines was performed to examine the association between treatment delay and all-cause mortality for stage III-IV lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. In the NCDB, propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare cumulative survival in patients who received "early" versus "delayed" treatment (ie, 0-30 vs. 90-120 days following diagnosis).

resultsCox regression analysis of the NLST (n = 392) and NCDB (n = 275,198) cohorts showed a decrease in hazard ratio the longer treatment was delayed. In propensity score-matched analysis, no significant differences in survival were found between early and delayed treatment for patients with stage IIIA, IIIB (T3-4,N2,M0), IIIC, and IV (M1B-C) adenocarcinoma and patients with IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IV squamous cell carcinoma (all log-rank P > .05). For patients with stage IIIB (T1-2,N3,M0) and stage IV (M1A) adenocarcinoma, delayed treatment was associated with improved survival (log-rank P = .03, P = .02). The findings were consistent in sensitivity analysis accounting for wait time bias.

conclusionIn this national analysis, for patients with stage III-IV adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, an extended treatment delay by 3 to 4 months was not associated with significantly decreased overall survival compared to prompt treatment. These findings can be used to guide decision-making during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellCOVID-19Lung NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingPandemicsCOVID-19DelayLung cancerOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID35660355
PMCPMC9068243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.