Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659930›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2022

Comprehensive evaluation and efficient classification of BRCA1 RING domain missense substitutions.

Kathleen A Clark, Andrew Paquette, Kayoko Tao, Russell Bell, Julie L Boyle, Judith Rosenthal, Angela K Snow, Alex W Stark, Bryony A Thompson, Joshua Unger and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the Clinical Relevance ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kathleen A ClarkHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Andrew PaquetteDepartment of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Kayoko TaoHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Russell BellHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Julie L BoyleHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Judith RosenthalHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Angela K SnowHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Alex W StarkDepartment of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Bryony A ThompsonHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Joshua UngerHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Jason GertzHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Katherine E VarleyHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Kenneth M BoucherHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
David E GoldgarHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
William D FoulkesLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada; Research Institute McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada; Departments of Medicine, Human Genetics, and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Alun ThomasDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Sean V TavtigianHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. Electronic address: sean.tavtigian@hci.utah.edu.

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
COMMON AND RARE SEQUENCE VARIANTS IN BREAST CANCER RISKR01CA121245 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TAVTIGIAN, SEAN VAHRAM · 2007 to 2021
$4.9M
Upgrading rigor and efficiency of germline cancer gene variant classification for the 2020sR01CA264971 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Sean Vahram Tavtigian · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121245NCI NIH HHS R01 CA264971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCA1 is a high-risk susceptibility gene for breast and ovarian cancer. Pathogenic protein-truncating variants are scattered across the open reading frame, but all known missense substitutions that are pathogenic because of missense dysfunction are located in either the amino-terminal RING domain or the carboxy-terminal BRCT domain. Heterodimerization of the BRCA1 and BARD1 RING domains is a molecularly defined obligate activity. Hence, we tested every BRCA1 RING domain missense substitution that can be created by a single nucleotide change for heterodimerization with BARD1 in a mammalian two-hybrid assay. Downstream of the laboratory assay, we addressed three additional challenges: assay calibration, validation thereof, and integration of the calibrated results with other available data, such as computational evidence and patient/population observational data to achieve clinically applicable classification. Overall, we found that 15%-20% of BRCA1 RING domain missense substitutions are pathogenic. Using a Bayesian point system for data integration and variant classification, we achieved clinical classification of 89% of observed missense substitutions. Moreover, among missense substitutions not present in the human observational data used here, we find an additional 45 with concordant computational and functional assay evidence in favor of pathogenicity plus 223 with concordant evidence in favor of benignity; these are particularly likely to be classified as likely pathogenic and likely benign, respectively, once human observational data become available.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsAnimalsBayes TheoremBRCA1 ProteinFemaleHumansMammalsMutation, MissenseProtein DomainsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanACMG VUS classificationBayesian data integrationBRCA1functional assay calibration

Identifiers

PMID35659930
PMCPMC9247830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.