Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659641›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the general population in Germany - a triangulation of data from two population-based health surveys and a laboratory sentinel system.

Martyna Gassowski, Christina Poethko-Müller, Martin Schlaud, Andrea Sailer, Kerstin Dehmel, Viviane Bremer, Sandra Dudareva, Klaus Jansen, Chlamydia trachomatis laboratory sentinel team

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. German evidence- and consensus-based guideline on the management of penile urethritis.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. General practice chlamydia testing: a qualitative study of staff approaches using behavioural change theory.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Urethritis-spectrum of pathogens, diagnostics and treatment].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  10. Evaluation ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martyna GassowskiPostgraduate Training for Applied Epidemiology (PAE, German Field Epidemiology Training Programme), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. epidemiology@gassowski.net.
Christina Poethko-MüllerDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Unit for Physical Health, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Martin SchlaudDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Central Epidemiological Laboratory, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Andrea SailerDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Unit for HIV/AIDS, STI and Blood-Borne Infections, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Kerstin DehmelDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Unit for HIV/AIDS, STI and Blood-Borne Infections, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Viviane BremerDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Unit for HIV/AIDS, STI and Blood-Borne Infections, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Sandra DudarevaDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Unit for HIV/AIDS, STI and Blood-Borne Infections, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Klaus JansenDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Unit for HIV/AIDS, STI and Blood-Borne Infections, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Chlamydia trachomatis laboratory sentinel team
Robert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) is a common, frequently asymptomatic, sexually transmitted infection. It can result in severe sequelae, such as ectopic pregnancy and infertility. In Germany, chlamydia is not notifiable. An opportunistic screening program for women < 25 years was introduced in 2008. The aim of this research was to triangulate different data sources to describe the epidemiological situation of chlamydia in Germany and to investigate whether the current target group of the chlamydia screening program aligns with these findings.

methodsUrine specimens from participants from population-based health examination surveys of children (2014-17) and adults (2008-11) were tested for chlamydia, using nucleic acid amplification testing. These data were used to generate weighted chlamydia prevalence estimates by age group and sex. Data from a nationwide chlamydia laboratory sentinel system (2014-16) were used to calculate the positive proportion among individuals tested for chlamydia by age, sex and test reason.

resultsUsing data from the population-based surveys, we found a chlamydia prevalence estimate of 2.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-7.5%) among all 15- to 17-year-old girls and of 9.6% (95% CI 0.0-23) among those reporting to be sexually active. In adult women, we found the highest prevalence among 18- to 24-year-olds (all: 2.3%; 95% CI 1.0-5.3%; sexually active: 3.1%; 95% CI 1.3-7.0%). In adult men, we found the highest prevalence among 25- to 29-year-olds (all: 3.5%; 95% CI 1.6-7.7%; sexually active: 3.3%; 95% CI 1.3-7.8%). Data from the chlamydia laboratory sentinel showed the highest positive proportion among those opportunistically screened in 19-year-old women (6.1%; 95%- CI 5.9-6.4%), among those screened due to pregnancy in 15-year-old girls (10%; 95% CI 8.5-12%), and among those tested due to symptoms or a positive partner in 19-year-old women (10%; 95% CI 9.8-11%) and 19-year-old men (24%; 95% CI 22-26%).

conclusionsChlamydia seems to mainly affect adolescents and young adults in Germany, with similar overall prevalence in men and women, but with slightly different age distributions. Women at highest risk of chlamydia are covered by the current screening program but given the on-going discussions in high-income countries on cost-effectiveness and benefit-to-harm ratio of these programs, the program-aim needs reconsideration.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisAdolescentAdultChildFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMass ScreeningPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsYoung AdultChlamydia trachomatisPrevalenceScreeningSexually transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID35659641
PMCPMC9164541
OpenAlexW4281764605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.