Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659632›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2022

Prognostic factors for patients with anal cancer treated with conformal radiotherapy-a systematic review.

Stelios Theophanous, Robert Samuel, John Lilley, Ann Henry, David Sebag-Montefiore, Alexandra Gilbert, Ane L Appelt

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Factors Influencing Outcomes and Survival in Anal Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stelios TheophanousLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. umsth@leeds.ac.uk.
Robert SamuelLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
John LilleyDepartment of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospitals, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Ann HenryLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
David Sebag-MontefioreLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Alexandra Gilbert *Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Ane L Appelt *Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
University of Leeds · GBSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28301Cancer Research UK 28832Cancer Research UK C19942/A28832Yorkshire Cancer Research L389AA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAnal cancer is primarily treated using concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), with conformal techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) now being the standard techniques utilised across the world. Despite this, there is still very limited consensus on prognostic factors for outcome following conformal CRT. This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing literature to identify prognostic factors for a variety of oncological outcomes in anal cancer, focusing on patients treated with curative intent using contemporary conformal radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature search was conducted using Medline and Embase to identify studies reporting on prognostic factors for survival and cancer-related outcomes after conformal CRT for anal cancer. The prognostic factors which were identified as significant in univariable and multivariable analysis, along with their respective factor effects (where available) were extracted. Only factors reported as prognostic in more than one study were included in the final results.

resultsThe results from 19 studies were analysed. In both univariable and multivariable analysis, N stage, T stage, and sex were found to be the most prevalent and reliable clinical prognostic factors for the majority of outcomes explored. Only a few biomarkers have been identified as prognostic by more than one study - pre-treatment biopsy HPV load, as well as the presence of leukocytosis, neutrophilia and anaemia at baseline measurement. The results also highlight the lack of studies with large cohorts exploring the prognostic significance of imaging factors.

conclusionEstablishing a set of prognostic and potentially predictive factors for anal cancer outcomes can guide the risk stratification of patients, aiding the design of future clinical trials. Such trials will in turn provide us with greater insight into how to effectively treat this disease using a more personalised approach.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedChemoradiotherapyHumansPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesAnal cancerCancer outcomesConformal radiotherapyIMRTPrognostic factorsSquamous cell carcinomaSurvival outcomesSystematic reviewVMAT

Identifiers

PMID35659632
PMCPMC9164501
OpenAlexW4281713530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.