Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659572›Full record

SynthesisBMC emergency medicine2022

What are the barriers and facilitators to effective health promotion in urgent and emergency care? A systematic review.

B Schofield, U Rolfe, S McClean, R Hoskins, S Voss, J Benger

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Facilitators to implementing preventive health interventions for adolescents in the emergency department: A multicenter qualitative analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B SchofieldUniversity of West of England School of Health and Social Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Glenside Campus, Bristol, BS16 1DD, England. behnaz.schofield@uwe.ac.uk.
U RolfeBournemouth University, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth House, Christchurch Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH1 3LH, UK.
S McCleanUniversity of the West of England Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, England.
R HoskinsUniversity of West of England School of Health and Social Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Glenside Campus, Bristol, BS16 1DD, England.
S VossUniversity of West of England School of Health and Social Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Glenside Campus, Bristol, BS16 1DD, England.
J BengerUniversity of West of England School of Health and Social Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Glenside Campus, Bristol, BS16 1DD, England.
University of the West of England · GBBournemouth University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are potential health gains such as reducing early deaths, years spent in ill-health and costs to society and the health and care system by encouraging NHS staff to use encounters with patients to help individuals significantly reduce their risk of disease. Emergency department staff and paramedics are in a unique position to engage with a wide range of the population and to use these contacts as opportunities to help people improve their health. The aim of this research was to examine barriers and facilitators to effective health promotion by urgent and emergency care staff.

methodsA systematic search of the literature was performed to review and synthesise published evidence relating to barriers and facilitators to effective health promotion by urgent and emergency care staff. Medical and social science databases were searched for articles published between January 2000 and December 2021 and the reference lists of included articles were hand searched. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed risk of bias. Data was extracted using a bespoke form created for the study.

resultsA total of 19 papers were included in the study. Four themes capture the narratives of the included research papers: 1) should it be part of our job?; 2) staff comfort in broaching the topic; 3) format of health education; 4) competency and training needs. Whilst urgent and emergency care staff view health promotion as part of their job, time restraints and a lack of knowledge and experience are identified as barriers to undertaking health promotion interventions. Staff and patients have different priorities in terms of the health topics they feel should be addressed. Patients reported receiving books and leaflets as well as speaking with a knowledgeable person as their preferred health promotion approach. Staff often stated the need for more training.

conclusionsFew studies have investigated the barriers to health promotion interventions in urgent and emergency care settings and there is a lack of evidence about the acceptability of health promotion activity. Additional research is needed to determine whether extending the role of paramedics and emergency nurses to include health promotion interventions will be acceptable to staff and patients.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesAllied Health PersonnelHealth PromotionHumansEmergency departmentEmergency medical servicesHealth promotionParamedicSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35659572
PMCPMC9164411
OpenAlexW4281621876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.