Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659408›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology clinics2022

Well-being in the Intensive Care Unit: Looking Beyond COVID-19.

Sheela Pai Cole, Shahla Siddiqui

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology clinics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Well-being in intensive care: reflections from a multinational survey.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Article
  2. Shared Decision-Making in Acute Pain Services.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sheela Pai ColeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, H3580, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: spaicole@stanford.edu.
Shahla SiddiquiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/@shahlasi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burnout among critical care personnel has increased due to the additional psychological and physical demands of caring for critically ill patients with limited resources. Factors that increase the risk of burnout include compassion fatigue, lack of control over the work environment, difficult interpersonal relationships, and constant exposure to end-of-life issues. Organizational commitment to physician wellbeing depends on improving workplace efficiency, recognizing stressors in the critical care environment, and providing resources to help manage staffing shortages. Community building, training in communication, and team-building strategies are important steps in building collaboration and camaraderie in the workplace.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCompassion FatigueCOVID-19HumansIntensive Care UnitsJob SatisfactionQuality of LifeBurnout syndromeCompassion fatigueCompassion satisfactionMoral injuryPsychological resilienceSecondary traumatic stress

Identifiers

PMID35659408
PMCPMC8802563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.