Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659315›Full record

ArticleEcho research and practice2022

Mid-term follow-up and outcomes of patients with prosthetic heart valves: a single-centre experience.

Sadie Bennett, Polyvios Demetriades, Keely Banks, Jacopo Tafuro, Rosie Oatham, Timothy Griffiths, Cheryl Oxley, Sally Clews, Grant Heatlie, Chun Shing Kwok and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Echo research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Echo Research and Practice enters a new era.Echo research and practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sadie BennettHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK. Sadie.Bennett@uhnm.nhs.uk.
Polyvios DemetriadesHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Keely BanksHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Jacopo TafuroHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Rosie OathamHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Timothy GriffithsHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Cheryl OxleyHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Sally ClewsHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Grant HeatlieHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Chun Shing KwokHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Simon DuckettHeart & Lung Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Royal Stoke University Hospital · GBKeele University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with prosthetic heart valves (PHV) require long-term follow-up, usually within a physiologist led heart valve surveillance clinic. These clinics are well established providing safe and effective patient care. The disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic on services has increased wait times thus we undertook a service evaluation to better understand the patients currently within the service and PHV related complications.

methodsA clinical service evaluation of the heart valve surveillance clinic was undertaken to assess patient demographics, rates of complications and patient outcomes in patients who had undergone a PHV intervention at our institute between 2010 and 2020.

resultsA total of 294 patients (mean age at time of PHV intervention: 71 ± 12 years, 68.7% male) were included in this service evaluation. Follow-up was 5.9 ± 2.7 years (range: 10 years). 37.1% underwent baseline transthoracic echo (TTE) assessment and 83% underwent annual TTE follow-up. Significant valve related complications were reported in 20 (6.8%) patients. Complications included a change in patient functional status secondary to significant PHV regurgitation (0.3%) or stenosis (0.3%), PHV thrombosis (0.3%) or infective endocarditis (3.7%). Significant valve related complications resulted in ten hospital admission (3.4%), two re-do interventions (0.6%), and four deaths (1.3%).

conclusionsThis service evaluation highlights the large number of patients requiring ongoing surveillance. Only a small proportion of patients develop significant PHV related complications resulting in a low incidence of re-do interventions and deaths.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyPatient outcomesProsthetic heart valves

Identifiers

PMID35659315
PMCPMC9167640
OpenAlexW4281661458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.